On 2010-06-25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > What page were we suggesting linking to?
>
> I don't think anybody proposed anything specific. Steve Holden
> suggested it should go to "reasoned discussion of the
> pros and cons as evinced in this thread"
On 2010-06-25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 25.06.2010 01:28, schrieb Stephen Thorne:
> > Steve Holden Wrote:
> >> Given the amount of interest this thread has generated I can't help
> >> wondering why it isn't more prominent in python.org cont
P are great examples, but there is plenty of room for all
> sorts of initiatives that result in development opportunities. I'd like
> to help.
I am extremely keen for this to happen. Does anyone have ownership of this
project? There was some discussion of it up-lis
vent to your discussion about python 3 ports.
--
Regards,
Stephen Thorne
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
ic decision-making process would be appropriate).
Yes, #python keeps the text "It's too early to use Python 3.x" in its topic.
Library support is the only reason.
--
Regards,
Stephen Thorne
Development Engineer
___
Python-Dev mailing list
utils related issues,
If you could look at a solution for http://bugs.python.org/issue1533164
I would be eternally grateful.
--
Regards,
Stephen Thorne
Development Engineer
NetBox Blue - 1300 737 060
NetBox Blue is proud to be a sponsor and exhibitor at IBM's Solutions
Showcase 2009 events
odespeak.net/issue/pypy-dev/issue240
Is there a good reason for this behaviour? It has broken my code (a
subclass of dict that populates a key before calling the superclasses
constructer, in the twisted codebase).
--
Stephen Thorne
"Give me enough b
(PyExc_TypeError,
"sequence expected, %.80s found",
orig->ob_type->tp_name);
return NULL;
}
I can't see an obvious solution, but perhaps generators should get
special treatment rega
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:03:25 -0500, Timothy Fitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:03:30 +1000, Stephen Thorne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Flat is better than nested" has one foot in concise powerful
> > programming, the other foot
