Re!
You think 700 microseconds for a COM transaction is slow? Perhaps it is
your expectations that need adjusting.
When I get an array of data (for example, numbers), the (same) list
conversion (len=1000) take 0.07 s
But with array of object, it is ten times more slow (0.7 s).
In my appli,
You wrote:
>
>Hi!
>
>I get a collection of (COM) objects:
>tobj = oie.prepartableau(#it's a JScript array of objects, returned
>by a JScript function via COM
>I convert (translate? transtype?) this collection to LIST:
>lobj = list(tobj)
>But it's (very) slow(*). I tried [i for i in to
Hi!
I get a collection of (COM) objects:
tobj = oie.prepartableau(#it's a JScript array of objects, returned
by a JScript function via COM
I convert (translate? transtype?) this collection to LIST:
lobj = list(tobj)
But it's (very) slow(*). I tried [i for i in tobj] ; I tried with it
> My app consists of 2 scripts. The first one is an infinite loop which
> calls periodically the second script. The first script does not work
> with COM. The second script makes one instance of COM, calls some its
> methods and ends. The first script waits until the second one finishes
> its job s
Dominick Lauzon wrote:
>
> Maybe not the right forum, but I am in the process of porting stuff
> developed originally on win32 to a win64 platform.
>
>
>
> One of the script used to call numpy and pylab.
>
>
>
> I cannot find 64bit specific installs for these but am wondering if
> installing th
Maybe not the right forum, but I am in the process of porting stuff
developed originally on win32 to a win64 platform.
One of the script used to call numpy and pylab.
I cannot find 64bit specific installs for these but am wondering if
installing the 32bit version would still work on my xp64
