Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz wrote:
> Ross McKerchar wrote:
>
>> b) Let me know if there's a more robust way of preventing the cache
>> write (there appears to be code supporting freezing functionality that
>> should help but I couldn't figure out a neat way of
I've noticed that the GetModuleForTypelib always (or at least once per
program-run) calls AddModuleToCache (both in win32com.client.gencache).
This results in an attempt to write to the pickled dictionary
gen_py/dicts.dat. Unfortunately the program I'm writing that uses
GetModuleForLib is run b
Tim Golden wrote:
> This -- just in case you haven't come across the expression --
> is called monkey-patching. It's a slightly general-purpose
> example of it, but it's something which is usefully easy
> to do in Python. (Consequently, it's easy to abuse but...)
Ah right - nice to know my dodgy h
A few months ago I posted asking for some advice on ways to extend
classes provided by com objects.
Primarily I was keen to make a com library that I work with a lot
(Notes/Domino if anyone's interested) nicer and more pythonic to use.
I've spent a good few hours bashing away and have found two
Kelie wrote:
> The simple code shown below runs fine. It adds a custom document property to
> the
> active word document. But as soon as i use makepy on the "Microsoft Office
> 11.0
> Object Library (2.3)", i get an AttributeError when run the same code:
> AttributeError: ' Library.DocumentProper
Roger Upole wrote:
> Ross McKerchar wrote:
>
>> Any suggestions would be much appreciated - even just some key phrases
>> that may help energise my search efforts...
>>
> An object needs to be registered in the Running Object Table (R
I am having trouble connecting to an already running python com server.
I have set CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER for my com object and I am using the
"GetObject" function in my vbscripts which connect to the com server.
I have written a simple test server that behaves very similarly to my
real server (ex
Tim Golden wrote:
> As you will realise if you've looked at my code, I'm
> using a delegation model. (Sounds grand, doesn't it:
> a delegation model!) Which basically means I keep
> a copy of the WMI COM object inside my own class and
> proxy things across where needed.
>
> Can't see why you could
Could somebody please confirm that my objectives below are neither 1)
Reinventing the wheel or 2) Attempting something that has deliberately
_not_ been done by someone far wiser than me.
Put simply I want to extend a com object, which, if I understand
correctly is not possible in the "normal" [
David Fraser wrote:
> Ross McKerchar wrote:
>> If there's enough interest I'll post it for download.
> I guess me asking would count as enough interest then? I'd be interested
> in the setup script used for it as well...
Sorry for the delay. It's all ava
Paul Moore wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Ross McKerchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would like to repackage the win32 extensions as an msi using the the
>> bdist_msi distutils extension, allowing me to deploy the package to
>> multiple clients using group policy.
&g
Is there anywhere I can download a compiled but unpackaged version of
pywin32?
I would like to repackage the win32 extensions as an msi using the the
bdist_msi distutils extension, allowing me to deploy the package to
multiple clients using group policy.
The sourceforge project page only lists
12 matches
Mail list logo
