On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:39 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jan 25, 2005, at 1:15, Brian Lenihan wrote:
I re-factored Markus F.X.J Oberhumer's excellent PySol solitaire so
it could be built as an OS X app bundle using Bob Ippolito's
brilliant py2app.
...
I am especially interested in finding out if the
On Jan 25, 2005, at 1:15, Brian Lenihan wrote:
I re-factored Markus F.X.J Oberhumer's excellent PySol solitaire so it
could be built as an OS X app bundle using Bob Ippolito's brilliant
py2app.
...
I am especially interested in finding out if the py2app bundle really
works with a stock 10.3 syst
I re-factored Markus F.X.J Oberhumer's excellent PySol solitaire so it
could be built as an OS X app bundle using Bob Ippolito's brilliant
py2app.
In addition, I fixed a few bugs, fixed the OS X key-bindings (in the
places that really matter), happied up some icons (thanks to everaldo)
and add
Hello.
I was swig'ing an extension that made use of veclib in its internals
and discovered that if python.h is included before veclib.h that
compilation will not succeed. It seems they are interacting so that
parts of fp.h are being left out when they shouldn't be.
I have distilled the probl
On Jan 24, 2005, at 20:04, has wrote:
Paul Berkowitz wrote:
It's probably on a par with AppleScript Studio [...] And most
applescripters won't even go near Studio because it's "too difficult".
Y'know what this says to me? "Opportunity."
Indeed, Studio IS "too difficult" for many novice scripters: t
Paul Berkowitz wrote:
>> Now, what about the folks who are complete
>> newcomers to Python and/or to programming in general?
Actually, writing Automator actions is probably always going to be too
difficult for that class of "users" (scripters). Even the AppleScript
variety is rather complex for s
On Jan 24, 2005, at 16:18, has wrote:
Bob wrote:
Now, what about the newbies, the new blood? The folks who are
complete newcomers to Python and/or to programming in general?
Personally, I'd rather not be bothered catering to that class of
users.
Well, I know _you're_ not - that's why the Universe
Bob wrote:
Now, what about the newbies, the new blood? The folks who are
complete newcomers to Python and/or to programming in general?
Personally, I'd rather not be bothered catering to that class of users.
Well, I know _you're_ not - that's why the Universe inflicted me upon
you, as a form of k
On 1/24/05 12:42 PM, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Now, what about the newbies, the new blood? The folks who are complete
>> newcomers to Python and/or to programming in general? Try to see it
>> from their point of view:
>
> Personally, I'd rather not be bothered catering to th
On Jan 24, 2005, at 2:52 PM, has wrote:
Bob wrote:
It's a question of marketing really: what type(s) of audience do you
wish to promote Python to, and what needs to be done to guarantee
each's capture?
From the public documentation, you would trivially construct an
Action in PyObjC with the fol
Bob wrote:
It's a question of marketing really: what type(s) of audience do
you wish to promote Python to, and what needs to be done to
guarantee each's capture?
From the public documentation, you would trivially construct an
Action in PyObjC with the following boilerplate:
# MyAction.py
from F
Hi Pete,
On Jan 24, 2005, at 8:45 AM, Pete wrote:
The result is close enough that I might be able to
convince my office to switch to Apple. You can't beat
that!
Brendan
I hope the wxPython devotees don't assume that Mac users want to see
Macs in the office to replace Windows??
I don't think wxPyt
On Jan 24, 2005, at 12:06, has wrote:
Bob wrote:
Given the description, it would be trivial to write an Automator
Action in PyObjC 1.2+ using the py2app plug-in bundle support.
Cool. How hard would it be to provide casual users a more Pythonic,
easy-to-use API over part or all of that, you think?
Bob wrote:
What's the advantage of PyObjC here? Just because it makes it easier
to write the plugin, or does it help with writing the Python code too?
The advantage of PyObjC here is that there are two interfaces for
creating plugins: Objective-C plugins that implement a certain method,
and applesc
On Jan 24, 2005, at 11:45, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
On 1/23/05 9:40 PM, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're totally wrong here. Automator actions *entirely separate* from
applications! Apple applications will not and can not support
Automator actions directly, but they may ship with Aut
Bob wrote:
Given the description, it would be trivial to write an Automator
Action in PyObjC 1.2+ using the py2app plug-in bundle support.
Cool. How hard would it be to provide casual users a more Pythonic,
easy-to-use API over part or all of that, you think?
The Objective-C API is going to be fa
On 1/23/05 9:40 PM, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're totally wrong here. Automator actions *entirely separate* from
> applications! Apple applications will not and can not support
> Automator actions directly, but they may ship with Automator actions.
> Whether these actions
The result is close enough that I might be able to
convince my office to switch to Apple. You can't beat
that!
Brendan
I hope the wxPython devotees don't assume that Mac users want to see
Macs in the office to replace Windows??
Not me. I used to get cheap remarks every time I bought my powerbook
On Jan 24, 2005, at 10:21, Bob Savage wrote:
On Jan 23, 2005, at 11:40 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
I would expect that the majority of actions that people will write in
Python will do very little inter-application communication anyway and
instead will do things that Python is significantly better tha
On Jan 23, 2005, at 11:40 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
I would expect that the majority of actions that people will write in
Python will do very little inter-application communication anyway and
instead will do things that Python is significantly better than
AppleScript at (doing stuff on a network,
> If we can make
> something that Mac users can grudgingly accept as
> capable of making
> good Mac interfaces, I'll feel we've accomplished
our
> goal. :-)
Kevin,
I would like to thank you for your work towards that
end. wxPython allows me to develop my apps both on my
home mac, and on my
> If we can make
> something that Mac users can grudgingly accept as
> capable of making
> good Mac interfaces, I'll feel we've accomplished
our
> goal. :-)
Kevin,
I would like to thank you for your work towards that
end. wxPython allows me to develop my apps both on my
home mac, and on my
22 matches
Mail list logo
