> Of course, if you do so and say the issue is settled, I'm going to be
> more than a little upset because I was asked to look into generating
> an icon, I have done so and even found someone who has already done
> some initial work on it, and I'm going to have to tell this person to
> scra
Hi Bill,
On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>> That's just one icon, we need several icons. At least we now have a
>> consistent set of icons. An historical looking set of icons, but a
>> *set*
>> of icons.
>
> Yes, I comprehend, several different icons for the various
> applicatio
> That's just one icon, we need several icons. At least we now have a
> consistent set of icons. An historical looking set of icons, but a *set*
> of icons.
Yes, I comprehend, several different icons for the various
applications are needed. The base logo is just a starting place.
> > Surely bett
>> Surely better to act up front! More snakes on the web page!
Ronald> But Python isn't named after snakes ;-) ;-)
True enough, but I think even Guido has abandoned that argument. Had it
been named "Monty Python", "Cleese" or "Cheeseshop" you might have a leg to
stand on, but it's just
On 2-mrt-2006, at 18:55, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Ron Oussoren writes:
>> The 16 ton icon stays until someone brings a better alternative.
>
> W. R. Wing writes:
>> I LIKE the python squeezing the apple. The 16 ton icon is not only
>> amateurish, it is so indirect an "in" joke as to be inscrutable
Donovan Preston wrote:
> Stop with the 16 ton weight/snakes/apples debate. Just use the new,
> official, python logo,
+1
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (20
Hi Donovan,
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Donovan Preston wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
>> Ron Oussoren writes:
>>> The 16 ton icon stays until someone brings a better alternative.
>
> Stop with the 16 ton weight/snakes/apples debate. Just use the new,
> official, py
On 3/2/06 9:55 AM, "Bill Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Oussoren writes:
>> The 16 ton icon stays until someone brings a better alternative.
>
> W. R. Wing writes:
>> I LIKE the python squeezing the apple. The 16 ton icon is not only
>> amateurish, it is so indirect an "in" joke as to
On Mar 2, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Ron Oussoren writes:
>> The 16 ton icon stays until someone brings a better alternative.
Stop with the 16 ton weight/snakes/apples debate. Just use the new,
official, python logo, which is a stylized icon that isn't going to
offend anybody, i
Ron Oussoren writes:
> The 16 ton icon stays until someone brings a better alternative.
W. R. Wing writes:
> I LIKE the python squeezing the apple. The 16 ton icon is not only
> amateurish, it is so indirect an "in" joke as to be inscrutable to
> anyone coming new to the party.
I agree with Wi
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On Thursday, March 02, 2006, at 02:20PM, Jerome Laheurte
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>
>>> On 28-feb-2006, at 22:07, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Known issues:
- "regrtest -uall" cr
On Thursday, March 02, 2006, at 02:20PM, Jerome Laheurte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>> On 28-feb-2006, at 22:07, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>>
>>> Known issues:
>>> - "regrtest -uall" crashes somewhere in test_db3 (bus error)
>>
>> I don't understand w
On Thursday, March 02, 2006, at 01:40PM, W. R. Wing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 5:56 PM -0600 3/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Ronald> The page looks fine, but it might be better to remove the icon
>> Ronald> or replace it by the current MacPython icon (the 16 ton
>> Ronald> we
At 5:56 PM -0600 3/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ronald> The page looks fine, but it might be better to remove the icon
> Ronald> or replace it by the current MacPython icon (the 16 ton
> Ronald> weight). It's not that I don't like the snake, but some people
> Ronald> claim a lif
14 matches
Mail list logo
