On 2/19/19 4:00 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>
>> hmm, I also think we should report our deprecated status as locked for
>> inconsistent bitmaps..
>>
>>
>
> Though we're trying to deprecate the field altogether, I *could* add a
> special status flag that makes it unambiguous. This will catch the
> atte
20.02.2019 1:00, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 2/18/19 1:13 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 14.02.2019 2:36, John Snow wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: John Snow
>>> ---
>>>block/dirty-bitmap.c | 15 +
>>>block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 42 ++
On 2/18/19 1:13 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 14.02.2019 2:36, John Snow wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow
>> ---
>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 15 +
>> block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 42 ++-
>> blockdev.c | 43 +
On 2/18/19 3:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 2/18/19 12:13 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 14.02.2019 2:36, John Snow wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: John Snow
>>> ---
>>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 15 +
>>> block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 42 ++
On 2/18/19 12:13 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 14.02.2019 2:36, John Snow wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow
>> ---
>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 15 +
>> block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 42 ++-
>> blockdev.c | 43 +++
14.02.2019 2:36, John Snow wrote:
> Signed-off-by: John Snow
> ---
> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 15 +
> block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 42 ++-
> blockdev.c | 43
> include/block/dirty-bitmap
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 15 +
block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 42 ++-
blockdev.c | 43
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 20 d
