Hi,
Am Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:09:53 +0100
schrieb DelazJ :
> +1 from me too. No need to do the work twice.
> But just to be sure, does it mean that for those who use the PDF version (I
> don't know if there are people who do that but I hope there are), there
> won't be the changelog available inside
+1 from me too. No need to do the work twice.
But just to be sure, does it mean that for those who use the PDF version (I
don't know if there are people who do that but I hope there are), there
won't be the changelog available inside the doc (but the same link to the
website)?
2016-03-03 17:51 GMT
+1
Yves Jacolin escreveu no dia quinta, 3/03/2016 às 15:20:
> On Thursday, March 03, 2016 16:00:38 Otto Dassau wrote:
> > I would propose that we only add the link to the visual changelog in the
> > manual and remove the rest. It makes no sense to me to have it twice.
> +1
>
> Y.
> _
On Thursday, March 03, 2016 16:00:38 Otto Dassau wrote:
> I would propose that we only add the link to the visual changelog in the
> manual and remove the rest. It makes no sense to me to have it twice.
+1
Y.
___
Qgis-community-team mailing list for orga
Hi,
I would propose that we only add the link to the visual changelog in the
manual and remove the rest. It makes no sense to me to have it twice.
Regards,
Otto
Am Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:52:26 +0100
schrieb DelazJ :
> Hi,
> Just wondering what'll be done for 2.14 doc "what's new" page [0]
> Note th
Hi,
Just wondering what'll be done for 2.14 doc "what's new" page [0]
Note that in previous version (2.8), there was a changelog in QGIS-Website
[1] and another one in documentation [2] and the latter was far incomplete.
and this process requiere double work (either for writer and translator).
Any
Hello,
We have a what's new feature in documentation and visual changelog in website.
Do we want to keep both of them?
Do we need to remove what's new and add a link to the visual changelog page?
Y.
___
Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing
