On 21/06/2020 13:38, Bob Spelten via Ql-Users wrote:
Op Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:46:23 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar via
Ql-Users :
I have a vague recollection that Simon N Goodwin did something
similar, maybe, in the DIY Toolkit.
I think it was passed a variable and a list of strings, and
returne
If we are talking about Selecting on single-character strings, such as when
coding actions depending on some keypress, I would like to tell you about how I
get around this problem. At the very beginning, I would declare some constants
of the codes of all the alphabetical characters, all 52 of th
If we are talking about Selecting on single-character strings, such as when
coding actions depending on some keypress, I would like to tell you about how I
get around this problem. At the very beginning, I would declare some constants
of the codes of all the alphabetical characters, all 52 of
That's probably the best solution for the problem - String$ SELECT has always
been a half-baked solution in SuperBASIC.
Tobias
> Am 21.06.2020 um 13:38 schrieb Bob Spelten via Ql-Users
> :
>
> Op Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:46:23 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
> :
>
>> I have a vague recol
Op Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:46:23 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
:
I have a vague recollection that Simon N Goodwin did something similar,
maybe, in the DIY Toolkit.
I think it was passed a variable and a list of strings, and returned the
position of the variable in the list. Somethi
I have a vague recollection that Simon N Goodwin did something similar, maybe,
in the DIY Toolkit.
I think it was passed a variable and a list of strings, and returned the
position of the variable in the list. Something like that.
Maybe useful?
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Sent from my Android device wit
I have already tried roughly all the various solutions and obviously we
know very well that they are solutions they don't really know satisfaction.
I also speak from the readability point of view, when you have to get your
hands by modifying the code written years before or written by other nested
On 20/06/2020 17:00, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote:
Op za 20 jun. 2020 14:01 schreef Dave Park via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>:
ooGyebd = Goodbye
goodbye <> Goodbye
Use a hash algorithm like CRC-16 or CRC-32? ;-)
Thats probably the fastest solution so far :o) Maybe overkill for
Op za 20 jun. 2020 14:01 schreef Dave Park via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>:
>
>
>
> ooGyebd = Goodbye
> goodbye <> Goodbye
>
> Use a hash algorithm like CRC-16 or CRC-32? ;-)
Jan
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 3:03 AM Derek Stewart via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my un-subtle attempt, how about summing the ASCII codes for the
> character string to be selected and use SELect ON to select the option
> based on the sum total, for example:
>
> 10 a$=
Hi,
Here is my un-subtle attempt, how about summing the ASCII codes for the
character string to be selected and use SELect ON to select the option
based on the sum total, for example:
10 a$="Goodbye"
15 asum=0
20 FOR a=1 TO LEN(a$): asum=asum+CODE(a)
40 SELect ON asum
50 = 255: REMark ASCII
On 19/06/2020 20:02, Daniel Baum via Ql-Users wrote:
What about doing something like this. In languages like c# the equivalent
of the "select on: command is hardly ever used and if .. else if ... else
is much more common:
100 INPUT a$
110 IF a$="a" THEN
115 PRINT "hello a"
120 ELSE
130 I
What about doing something like this. In languages like c# the equivalent
of the "select on: command is hardly ever used and if .. else if ... else
is much more common:
100 INPUT a$
110 IF a$="a" THEN
115 PRINT "hello a"
120 ELSE
130 IF a$="b"
135 PRINT "hello b"
150 ELSE
155
For that I think it is easier to implement a new instruction (even an
external extension) instead of modifying the current instruction.
Il giorno ven 19 giu 2020 alle ore 12:19 pjwitte via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> ha scritto:
> On 19/06/2020 10:52, Giorgio Garabello via Ql-Users wrot
On 19/06/2020 10:52, Giorgio Garabello via Ql-Users wrote:
"SELect ON" instruction
I find it has a major flaw that will not allow you to manage alphanumeric
variables,
I unfortunately don't know the assemly
Would someone be available to create an extension similar to SELECT (e.g.
SELECT $) capa
"SELect ON" instruction
I find it has a major flaw that will not allow you to manage alphanumeric
variables,
I unfortunately don't know the assemly
Would someone be available to create an extension similar to SELECT (e.g.
SELECT $) capable of handling strings?
I understand that it is not simple ..
16 matches
Mail list logo