Michael Holzt wrote:
| item leave_old_headers [0|1|2]
|
| Another mail server before might have checked this mail already and may have
| added X-Spam-Status, X-Spam-Flag and X-Spam-Check-By lines. In general this
| headers can not be trusted (may be forged by an spammer) and should be
| removed
John Peacock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think that the patch should emulate current behavior as
a default, i.e. anyone upgrading /now/ should get the current SA
plugin behavior, no matter how much I prefer stripping the
previous headers.
It seems to me that the default behavior should
I still think that the patch should emulate current behavior as a default,
i.e. anyone upgrading /now/ should get the current SA plugin behavior, no
matter how much I prefer stripping the previous headers.
In my opinion the current behaviour is bad, wrong, unusual and dangerous
and we should
Michael Holzt wrote:
I'm very certain that nobody right now uses the bug/feature that
old X-Spam-Status lines are not getting removed.
Reread the comment here:
news://nntp.perl.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is largely why I reverted the previous patch.
If Robert is happy with the ability to
If Robert is happy with the ability to preserve the headers, but having
the default behavior change, I'm satisfied and would commit the change.
So Robert, please make a comment on this.
-kju
--
It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part of it. -- Bill Hicks
On 11 Oct 2004, at 19:53, John Peacock wrote:
Michael Holzt wrote:
I'm very certain that nobody right now uses the bug/feature that
old X-Spam-Status lines are not getting removed.
Reread the comment here:
news://nntp.perl.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is largely why I reverted the previous
Matt Sergeant wrote:
As an ex spamassassin developer, I support the change. However I don't
use the plugin (SA isn't aggressive enough for me), so don't take my
word as gospel.
That's what's funny - I don't use SA any more either! I'm using dspam
to great effect:
Your overall accuracy
Michael Holzt wrote:
So Robert, please make a comment on this.
I just saw a posting from Robert on P5P:
Perl5 Bug Summary --
Live from the middle of the Adriacic Sea, on the way to Greece.
Perl Whirl 2004!
So I wouldn't hold your breath... ;)
John
Would it be worth adding Apache::Qpsmtpd to the base distro?
http://www.sergeant.org/Apache-Qpsmtpd/
On 11 Oct 2004, at 20:26, John Peacock wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
As an ex spamassassin developer, I support the change. However I
don't use the plugin (SA isn't aggressive enough for me), so don't
take my word as gospel.
That's what's funny - I don't use SA any more either! I'm using dspam
On 11 Oct 2004, at 21:06, John Peacock wrote:
Block anything without a Message-ID header.
Block anything without any Received headers.
Block anything found in CBL, SBL and SORBS.
Block anything HELOing with a string matching \d+[\.-]\d+
Block anything marked bulk in DCC.
I'm managing a corporate
11 matches
Mail list logo