Re: [Rd] rowSums()/colSums() don't preserve the 'integer' storage mode

I don't see the cost of doing so paying off. storage.mode is really only important if you are passing arguments to compiled code. If you are passing to compiled code, you really need to ensure the storage mode is what you think it is, anyway. Bill Venables. -Original Message- From:

[Rd] rowSums()/colSums() don't preserve the 'integer' storage mode

Hi, Wouldn't that make sense to have rowSums()/colSums() to preserve the storage mode? m <- matrix(1:15, nrow=5) > storage.mode(m) [1] "integer" > storage.mode(sum(m)) [1] "integer" > storage.mode(rowSums(m)) [1] "double" <--- surprising! Cheers, H. _

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

2008/7/16 Jeffrey Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Laurent Gautier wrote on 07/16/2008 08:02 AM: >> >> The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the >> R_CStackLimit with: >> >> R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; >> >> The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing

Re: [Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:57:39 +0200, > Arne Henningsen (AH) wrote: > Hi Bernhard! > On Wednesday 16 July 2008 14:16:05, you wrote: >> I do not know if this matters, but have you used 'results = verbatim' in >> your R code chunk? See page 13 in: >> http://www.statistik.lmu.de/~le

Re: [Rd] split.Date

> McGehee, Robert writes: > Hello, > I wanted to suggest that the below method for split.Date be added to the > base library to significantly speed up splits with values of class Date. > In the below example I show a speed improvement of 175x for 1000 data > points. On a vector of size 1e6, th

Re: [Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

Markus, That's interesting. I'm using snow_0.3-0 that's the version on CRAN. I see that on the maintainer's website newer versions are available... I just tried snow_0.3-3 and as you said it actually works fine! Thanks a lot for the help, that's exactly what I was looking for! // Giuseppe

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

Laurent Gautier wrote on 07/16/2008 08:02 AM: The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is what are the potential problems ? The problem is a

[Rd] Rinterfaces.h

Dear List, Is there a reason that Rinterfaces.h is not contained in include directory of the official distribution on Windows? thx, Peter [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/li

Re: [Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

Hello, we are using Rmpi and snow on windows. It is working very well. We are using Windows Server 2003 and *MPICH2. I probably will manage to have some tests with the new snow (*snow_0.3-3)* version this week. Best Markus Martin Morgan schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guys, I'm r

Re: [Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Guys, > > I'm running R on both Windows & Linux. I'm looking at a number of packages > for parallel execution. It seems that the most used packages are "snow" and > "Rmpi". > > snow seems more user friendly, but it doesn't run on windows. I see from > searching the mail

[Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

Guys, I'm running R on both Windows & Linux. I'm looking at a number of packages for parallel execution. It seems that the most used packages are "snow" and "Rmpi". snow seems more user friendly, but it doesn't run on windows. I see from searching the mailing list that I'm not the first one to t

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

Laurent, On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote: The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is what are the potential problems ?

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is what are the potential problems ? The R-extensions manual says: " Stack-checking can be disabled by

Re: [Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

Hi Bernhard! On Wednesday 16 July 2008 14:16:05, you wrote: > I do not know if this matters, but have you used 'results = verbatim' in > your R code chunk? See page 13 in: > http://www.statistik.lmu.de/~leisch/Sweave/Sweave-manual.pdf Thank you for this hint. I have tried this option, but it seem

Re: [Rd] spss long labels

Hi Kurt, I have committed your patch and your new spss_long.sav example file, tested things and uploaded a new version of 'foreign', namely 0.8-27 to CRAN. I vaguely remember that other useRs have asked for long-label support in the past, so if you are (or know of) such a user, we'd be glad if yo

Re: [Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

Hello Arne, I do not know if this matters, but have you used 'results = verbatim' in your R code chunk? See page 13 in: http://www.statistik.lmu.de/~leisch/Sweave/Sweave-manual.pdf Best, Bernhard > >Hi, > >I want to have a "vignette" in one of my R packages. Hence, I >added an Sweave >file i

[Rd] Problems with snowfall

Guys, Is anyone using snowfall? It seems that the last version is broken. sfinit contains test code: data("config", package = "snowfall") configM <- as.matrix(t(config)) config <- as.list(configM) names(config) <- dimnames(configM)[[2]] .sfOption$SERVER <<- as.character(confi

[Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

Hi, I want to have a "vignette" in one of my R packages. Hence, I added an Sweave file into the /inst/doc subdirectory of this package. Unfortunately, 'R CMD check' gives a warning: == [...] * checking tests ... OK * checking package vignettes in 'inst/do