maxime...@ensae.fr wrote:
Full_Name: Maxime To
Version: 2.9
OS: WIndows
Submission from: (NULL) (81.57.236.122)
I am using the npindex and npindexbw fubctions of the NP package. I would like
to compute the predicted values of the model and tried to use the predict
function for this purpose but
A couple of weeks ago I posted a trick in R-help on improving Quartz
behaviour in the command line version of R:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/help/09/04/12948.html .
Works with Aqua Tcl/Tk 8.5 too, but I discovered one annoying
side-effect. After having a Tk dialog open (and using it) for
Full_Name: Maxime To
Version: 2.9
OS: WIndows
Submission from: (NULL) (81.57.236.122)
I am using the npindex and npindexbw fubctions of the NP package. I would like
to compute the predicted values of the model and tried to use the predict
function for this purpose but the function only gives me t
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:06:38PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
[...]
> The version I have committed a few hours ago is indeed a much
> re-simplified version, using as.character(.) explicitly
> and consequently no longer providing the extra optional
> arguments that we have had for a couple of da
> "PS" == Petr Savicky
> on Sun, 10 May 2009 13:52:53 +0200 writes:
PS> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 10:55:17PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote:
PS> [...]
>> If'd revert to such a solution,
>> we'd have to get back to Peter's point about the issue that
>> he'd think table
Impressive stuff. Nice to see people giving some though to this.
I will explore the packages you mentioned.
Thank you
Saptarshi Guha
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Patrick Aboyoun wrote:
> Saptarshi,
> I know of two alternatives you can use to do fast extraction of consecutive
> subsequenc
> Christophe Dutang writes:
> Hi,
> I have a problem when checking the package 'probdistr' (on probability
> distributions).
> I got this warning
> * checking index information ... WARNING
> Vignettes with missing or empty \VignetteIndexEntry:
> [1] "probdistr-chi""probdistr-conte
Pierre- I wonder how many people have to submit this concern before someone
takes care of the problem. I may have been the first to point this out
because I got a reply from an R core member that was rude, to say the least.
Now there are no responses to this query. I set up a page to keep track
