Hello,
the order of argument is not the correct one:
p(2.45,6,28)
[1] 0.9503618
P.A.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Joerg Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example
>
> F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or F0.95[10,20]=2.35
>
> but
>
> > pf(6,28,2.45)
> [1] 0.8854934
> >
P4 arch
and thread support enabled
What does it means ?
Some specifications
I have a dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz with Linux Suse 9.0 :
kernel, gcc and make version
2.4.21-99-smp
gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 (SuSE Linux)
GNU Make 3.80
Rversion : R-1.8.1
Atlas version 3.6.0
Thanks
Pie
ng change (that
was the last chance attempt).
I just give up and this R-debugger problem on sparc-linux will wait until
I change/upgrade the whole operating system (in the next millenium ?).
Thanks a lot for all your ideas
Pierre-Andre Cornillon
On 21 Jan 2003, Douglas Bates wrote:
> You are se
can run on other
program than R to know if it is R-1.6.2 on sparc or gdb 5.2.1 which have some
problems. I just recall that i have already done simple test with gdb.
Thanks for all, and if any (even slight) hints...
Pierre-Andre Cornillon
__
[EMAIL P
Hello,
I had the same problem with Solaris 7 and 8. I just
re-compile readline (I used the readline-4.2) and recompile R
and no problem afterwards. I think it's better
not using the sunfreeware package of readline, it doesn't works properly
(1 year ago).
Good luck
PS
a/ to have static or shared
nge
my system:
Ultrasparc 10, sparc Gnu-Linux Suse 7-3, gcc 2-95-3
kernel 2.4.14 (Suse standard)
Note that setting the same breakpoint with the same program on a
Pentium IV, Gnu-Linux Suse 7-3, gcc 2-95-3
kernel 2.4.14 (Suse standard) works perfectly...
Does anybody have some hints on this topic?