Gabor Grothendieck myway.com> writes:
:
: Adaikalavan Ramasamy cancer.org.uk> writes:
:
: :
: : Thank you to Marc Schwartz and Gabor Grothendieck for their responses.
: : Both solutions are useful.
: :
: : It would be nice to generalise this problem to situations where other
: : operations b
Gabor, thank you. This is very helpful.
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 18:10, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Adaikalavan Ramasamy cancer.org.uk> writes:
>
> :
> : Thank you to Marc Schwartz and Gabor Grothendieck for their responses.
> : Both solutions are useful.
> :
> : It would be nice to generalise th
Adaikalavan Ramasamy cancer.org.uk> writes:
:
: Thank you to Marc Schwartz and Gabor Grothendieck for their responses.
: Both solutions are useful.
:
: It would be nice to generalise this problem to situations where other
: operations besides difference. Maybe a new member of apply family -
: p
Thank you to Marc Schwartz and Gabor Grothendieck for their responses.
Both solutions are useful.
It would be nice to generalise this problem to situations where other
operations besides difference. Maybe a new member of apply family -
pwapply for pairwise apply ?
Of course the output would be d
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 20:28, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 18:30, Adaikalavan Ramasamy wrote:
> > There was a BioConductor thread today where the poster wanted to find
> > pairwise difference between columns of a matrix. I suggested the slow
> > solution below, hoping that someone mi
Adaikalavan Ramasamy cancer.org.uk> writes:
:
: There was a BioConductor thread today where the poster wanted to find
: pairwise difference between columns of a matrix. I suggested the slow
: solution below, hoping that someone might suggest a faster and/or more
: elegant solution, but no other
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 18:30, Adaikalavan Ramasamy wrote:
> There was a BioConductor thread today where the poster wanted to find
> pairwise difference between columns of a matrix. I suggested the slow
> solution below, hoping that someone might suggest a faster and/or more
> elegant solution, but n
There was a BioConductor thread today where the poster wanted to find
pairwise difference between columns of a matrix. I suggested the slow
solution below, hoping that someone might suggest a faster and/or more
elegant solution, but no other response.
I tried unsuccessfully with the apply() family
