: Tuesday, 16 August 2011 8:29 PM
To: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] anisotropy modeling [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi Jin,
some comments below:
On 16-Aug-11 3:38, jin...@ga.gov.au wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following Edzer's examples, I have tried to test the effects of the
>
-geo-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Edzer Pebesma
Sent: Tuesday, 19 July 2011 5:59 PM
To: shweta jp
Cc: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] anisotropy modeling
The description says:
The automatic fitting is done through fit.variogram.
hed a light on this? Thanks.
Jin
-Original Message-
From: r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Edzer Pebesma
Sent: Tuesday, 19 July 2011 5:59 PM
To: shweta jp
Cc: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] anisotropy modeling
Th
Pavlič wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for the reply. Can you explain this a little bit more :
>>> " it assumes the variogram to fit to is in the major (correlation)
>> direction (or averaged over all directions)."
>>>
>>> I don't
; thanks for the reply. Can you explain this a little bit more :
> > " it assumes the variogram to fit to is in the major (correlation)
> direction (or averaged over all directions)."
> >
> > I don't know exactly ehat it means
> > m
> >
> &
oun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Edzer Pebesma
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:10 AM
> To: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] anisotropy modeling
>
>
>
> On 07/12/2011 10:52 PM, Matevž Pavlič wrote:
>
.@r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Edzer Pebesma
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:10 AM
To: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] anisotropy modeling
On 07/12/2011 10:52 PM, Matevž Pavlič wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> i 'm am not en
On 07/12/2011 10:52 PM, Matevž Pavlič wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> i 'm am not entirely sure I understand anisotropy kriging in R.
>
> I have a data set in which is (at least i think so) anisotropy is clearly
> visible. So I made directional variograms
>
> So as i understand, the only th
Hi all,
i 'm am not entirely sure I understand anisotropy kriging in R.
I have a data set in which is (at least i think so) anisotropy is clearly
visible. So I made directional variograms
So as i understand, the only thing that is different from >normal< kriging is
the >anis< propert
