k]
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 3:08 AM
> To: Hodgess, Erin
> Cc: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] back with cutoff/variogram question
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Hodgess, Erin wrote:
>> Hello again.
>>
>> I'm back with the va
, 2013 3:08 AM
> To: Hodgess, Erin
> Cc: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] back with cutoff/variogram question
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Hodgess, Erin wrote:
>> Hello again.
>>
>> I'm back with the variogram question. Here is the in
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 3:08 AM
To: Hodgess, Erin
Cc: r-sig-geo@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] back with cutoff/variogram question
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Hodgess, Erin wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> I'm back with the variogram question. Here is the info
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Hodgess, Erin wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> I'm back with the variogram question. Here is the info from the help file:
>
> cutoff: spatial separation distance up to which point pairs are
> included in semivariance estimates; as a default, the length
>
Hello again.
I'm back with the variogram question. Here is the info from the help file:
cutoff: spatial separation distance up to which point pairs are
included in semivariance estimates; as a default, the length
of the diagonal of the box spanning the data is divided by
