Re: [rb-general] Debian buster, 54% reproducible in practice (Re: Core Debian reproducibility: 57% and rising!)

2019-03-02 Thread John Gilmore
> Though without solving #894441 we cannot reach much higher than 80%=20 > (because 93% is the current theoretic maximum, of which we need to=20 > distract 12% binNMUs...) Even without solving the general binNMU problem, can't you make more packages reproducible by eliminating those packages' depe

Re: [rb-general] Greetings and Questions

2019-03-02 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 08:16:06AM -0800, Anh Pham wrote: > Hello, > My name is Anh Pham and I am interested in contributing to Reproducible > Builds project as an Outreachy applicant! Welcome > May I ask why I could not join the project's IRC channel? Because I clicked > on the link and type my

[rb-general] Greetings and Questions

2019-03-02 Thread Anh Pham
Hello, My name is Anh Pham and I am interested in contributing to Reproducible Builds project as an Outreachy applicant! May I ask why I could not join the project's IRC channel? Because I clicked on the link and type my nickname and all I got was the red box with "Error Connecting (Closing Link: 1

Re: [rb-general] Debian buster, 54% reproducible in practice (Re: Core Debian reproducibility: 57% and rising!)

2019-03-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Vagrant Cascadian wrote on Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:11 +00:00: > On 2019-03-01, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > David A. Wheeler wrote on Fri, 01 Mar 2019 23:01 +00:00: > >> The *majority* (54%) of packages in real-world Debian Buster are now > >> reproducible!! > > > > (Just to be clear, that's the figure fo