on 1/13/10 9:25 PM, rcnute at rcn...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Why not clearance for JBs and fenders, wonders I?
>
I think GP is being a little careful with the description at this point.
There are a whole heckuvalotta variables between now and when the finished
production frames show up - things cou
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Esteban wrote:
> I think this will work out quite nicely for Rivendell. Remember the
> pain of managing the QBP partnership with the Bleriot? Soma will
> manage the bike, and Riv gets to see more people on a more sensible
> road bike.
>
> If someone walks into a
Steve Palincsar wrote:
>The difference between 72 and 73 degrees should easily be accommodated
>with a zero-setback post. Are you saying you are already using one of
>those with a 73 degree seat tube?
I am--my "ideal," seat tube angle with the saddle I typically use is 73.5.
That assumes a zer
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:30 -0500, Frederick, Steve wrote:
> I hope it has a seat tube angle of 73 degrees or so--the gradually
> slackening(!) of Riv's bikes has put them outside my fit zone. (since I
> don't use Brooks saddles, I don't need so much setback)
>
The difference between 72 and
I hope it has a seat tube angle of 73 degrees or so--the gradually
slackening(!) of Riv's bikes has put them outside my fit zone. (since I don't
use Brooks saddles, I don't need so much setback)
Oh, and I hope my size comes with 650b wheels!
Steve Frederick, East Lansing, MI
-Original M
