Dear Karen,
If you are not guilty of any of the suspicions that has been cast your
way -you don't have to be so defensive.
By your own words you have incriminated yourself. Please do not waste our
time and energy anymore.
Judi
----- Original Message -----
From: Karen Crook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [recoznet2] Karen issue
> I've noticed a very obvious underlying theme here on this site.
> It seems to me that the problem is you seem to tarnish the police service
> with the same brush!!!
> Isn't that being a bit prejudiced?
> If as most of you seem to think that all police are racist etc - then why
do
> Aboriginal people join? They are more than entitled to and they are openly
> accepted into the Service.
> Not everyone in the police is racist. Same as not everyone in the world is
> racist.
> Let's turn the tables here: How many police officers do you people know
and
> have spoken to personally? Do you know what life is like for them out on
the
> streets everyday dealing with the scumbags they usually face? The
> possibility of getting shot, injected, punched, abused, spat at, etc-how
do
> they feel? Do you know what it is like for their families not knowing if
> their loved ones will come home tonight?????
>
> I get shot down for my subsequent disregard for answers to my questions -
> then how is it when I have posed some questions people have ignored them
or
> brushed them aside? Goes both ways.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trudy & Rod Bray
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2000 2:54 PM
> To: RecOzNet2
> Subject: [recoznet2] Karen issue
>
>
> Ben and Ian,
>
> I can understand your frustration and anger at Karen's inability or
> refusal to understand the extent of discrimination against Aboriginal
> Australians and their subsequent disadvantage. She displays the thinking
> of many in the police force.
>
> Although, Ben, I don't see your objection - as an insult - to having the
> NT mandatory sentencing act posted. I see it as information gained and a
> chance to 'know our enemy'.
>
> I know that Karen's continued 'questions' and subsequent disregard of
> any answers she gets, gets up a lot of people's noses and we wish to be
> rid of her. So far, there are two of you and I am sure there are a few
> more that haven't said anything yet - but will soon, I am sure.
>
> I have made suggestions before to those who cannot handle having Karen
> on the list - put her in a killfile or filter or don't add fire to the
> flames by responding to her 'questions'. Some people have done this and
> are no longer aggravated by Karen's posts except when someone responds
> and her post goes through the filter.
>
> I know this is not the answer you want from me but I have a few
> questions of my own....
>
> --If not for breach of the rules, when do we kick someone off?
> --Every time someone says something we don't like or agree with?
> --How many of the 'we' would it take?
> --Where do we draw the line on what is said?
> --How much do we believe in freedom of speech?
> --How do we try to change 60% of the Australian public when we can't
> handle just one of them on the list?
>
> I am amenable to adding a rule about racist statements but it will have
> to be worked out exactly what that entails (no vagueness) and voted on -
> simple majority of list membership will do.
>
> What do you say?
>
> Trudy
>
>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________
> Truth is a pathless land. --- Krishnamurti
> -------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------
> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/
> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
> body
> of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
> permission from the
> copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and
> research under the "fair
> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed
> further without
> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @
> http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at http://www.mail-archive.com/
> To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
> of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
> This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
> copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
> use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed further without
> permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
> RecOzNet2 is archived for members @
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/
>
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission
from the
copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/
