Re: Kernel build from SRPM fails (fwd)

2000-10-03 Thread Eino Jakku
The same problem was already in 2.2.16-3 kernel. Pekka Savola wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > When building kernel from the SRPM (stock RH7) the build fails, see > > below... This happens both on a clean install of RH7.0 and on a > > box up

Re: kernel panic

2000-10-03 Thread Aaron Whiteman
At least on my Athlon, one you update your kernel to 2.2.16 from updates.redhat.com (or your favorite mirror), it doesn't try to disable the processor any more. Since I didn't know of the below, I booted off a rescue disk I created during install (knowing this would happen), got on the network,

Re: kernel panic

2000-10-03 Thread schang
The solution was posted at epox msgboard. At the lilo prompt, type in "linux x86_serial_nr=1". Then you're all set, the kernal will find a serial number and be happy. I tried different ways to amend the /etc/lilo.conf, include 'append...', 'default=linux x86...', etc, so that I don't have to watc

Re: kernel panic

2000-10-03 Thread kevin
Brian Clifton wrote: > > Just rebooted RH6.2 to receive the following error message: > > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle the task! > In swapper task - not syncing I found this with Duron processors. RedHat seems to think they are a PIII and tries it impliment cpuid and of course this i

Re: Kernel build from SRPM fails (fwd)

2000-10-03 Thread Pekka Savola
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Matilainen Panu (NRC/Helsinki) wrote: > Hi, > > When building kernel from the SRPM (stock RH7) the build fails, see > below... This happens both on a clean install of RH7.0 and on a > box upgraded from 6.2->7.0. Am I missing something obvious here (yes I'm > using kgcc) or sh

Re: what has happened to announce and watch lists?

2000-10-03 Thread John Summerfield
> What has happened to Red Hat announce and watch mailing lists? > Where are the announcements for new lpr packages, and two updates for > Red Hat 7.0, MySQL and LPRng? Where's the announcement for Red Hat 7.0 > itself? > > I really hope these problems have nothing to do with the launch of Red Ha

Re: sendmail RPM containing /etc/aliases

2000-10-03 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from > localhost (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by emu.os2.ami.com.au (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA04199 > for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:26:06 +0800 Received: from > os2.ami.com.au [203.55.31.51] > by localh

RE: RHL 7.0

2000-10-03 Thread Barry Smoke
My installation did the same... Upon rebooting, I had my old kernel boot, which completely messed up all modules, edited lilo.conf, /sbin/lilo rebooted, depmod, couple more reboots, finally started working correctly. RH7.0 broke my x ...still haven't gotten it back up yet, I can't recompile the k

Re: RHL 7.0

2000-10-03 Thread Craig Kelley
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Ivan Jager wrote: > I finally finished downloading Red Hat Linux 7.0. I repartitioned my HD and did a >complete install. > > During the installation one thing I noticed was that every time I > pressed F1 it would say the help for that was not available. Is that > only becau

what has happened to announce and watch lists?

2000-10-03 Thread Alex Kanavin
What has happened to Red Hat announce and watch mailing lists? Where are the announcements for new lpr packages, and two updates for Red Hat 7.0, MySQL and LPRng? Where's the announcement for Red Hat 7.0 itself? I really hope these problems have nothing to do with the launch of Red Hat Network...

Re: kernel panic

2000-10-03 Thread schang
Is it amd chip based? - Original Message - From: Brian Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 2:52 PM Subject: kernel panic > > Just rebooted RH6.2 to receive the following error message: > > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle the tas

Re: sendmail RPM containing /etc/aliases

2000-10-03 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:17:44AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > It's part of sendmail; it's a standard sendmail configuration file. Quite right. Just to make it more clear: It's not up to any of the Linux development groups whether it's part of sendmail or not--they can't control the conten

conversion of a denorm float -> double is busted

2000-10-03 Thread Uncle George
> conversion of a denorm float -> double is busted on the alpha. > > from the attached program , the iteration at I=-126 fails to properly > convert the first denormal float number into a corresponding double > ( the double is not denormal ). The exponent for the double should have > been 896 (

Re: Bind - failed compilation

2000-10-03 Thread Piotr Majka
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Pekka Savola wrote: > Have you tried applying the patches included in bind-8.2.2_P5-25? > bind 8.2.2 didn't build cleanly out of the box on RH6.2 either, IIRC. Yep. -- Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP & GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uin: 20873695 GCM d- s-:- a- C++

Modem conection velocity/kernel

2000-10-03 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
Hi; I got a VERY weird problem. My system: PIII 600/128 RAM, 20 Gb HD, SBLive!, NVidia TNT2 (M64), Booktree Bt878 TV card with FM tuner and remote control. RH7. Out-of-the-box, all works except the 3D acceleration (for obvious reasons, with a little tweaking it gets perfect), and the TV card (no

Re: sendmail RPM containing /etc/aliases

2000-10-03 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote: >Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 08:17:44 +0800 >From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Subject: Re: sendmail RPM containing /etc/aliases > >> Hi, >> >> I think /etc/aliases should be inde

Re: Bind - failed compilation

2000-10-03 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Piotr Majka wrote: > > Welcome > > RH 7.0, using egsc (kgcc), bind-8.2.3_T6B > > kgcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti > -pipe -s -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -ffast-math -mieee-fp > -fexpensive-optimizations -fexceptions -o nslookup