PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope... That didnt work.
> -Original Message-----
> From: Kapil Khanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Sendmail problem]
>
>
> Michael,
> I had a similar problem. I had o
Michael,
I had a similar problem. I had one linux server that i was sending mail from.
When i send mail from that machine to the outside world the mail had
information that it was coming from localhost.localadmin.
I tried to use the masquerade_as functionality but that itself did not work.
In addit
Fixed the user password issue:
i used the passwd
instead of usermod -p> or useradd -p
Kapil Khanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This worked
useradd -e 9 -g -p username
However when i try to logon as the user i cannot and get an authentication
denied.
I also tried usermod -p use
?
Kapil Khanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On RH 7.2 the following useradd command always returns invalid date.
useradd -e 2099-01-01 -g -p username
also tried
useradd -e "2099-01-01" -g -p username
on running man useradd for the -e option this is what it says
The date o
On RH 7.2 the following useradd command always returns invalid date.
useradd -e 2099-01-01 -g -p username
also tried
useradd -e "2099-01-01" -g -p username
on running man useradd for the -e option this is what it says
The date on which the user account will be disabled. The date is
s
Apache shutdown abnormally. How does one determine the cause of this
shutdown?
I checked the error_log and this is what i found
[Sun Mar 2 04:21:22 2003] [error] mod_ssl: Init: (j2eerules.com:443) Ops, no
RSA or DSA server certificate found?!
[Sun Mar 2 04:21:22 2003] [error] mod_ssl: Init: (j2ee
My linux box was started to respond very slowly so i ran top.
What i saw was vim was consuming 90%+ CPU. So i decided to run strace
strace -p revealed
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
over and over again.
The strange thi
01 Mar 2003 13:06:19 -0700, Kapil Khanna wrote:
> My linux box is running slow and on running top i find the following
>
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> 13033 root 14 0 996 996 848 R40.1 1.0 2:25 rmoveservice
> 13032 r
My linux box is running slow and on running top i find the following
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
13033 root 14 0 996 996 848 R40.1 1.0 2:25 rmoveservice
13032 root 13 0 1036 1036 884 S18.8 1.0 1:19 expandrepeats
13034 r
h mount.
<>
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 14:04, Kapil Khanna wrote:
> Joe,
> Thanks for the suggestions. Well i am using the laptop as a server so it
will
> always be connected on the network.
> >From reading your suggestions i thought maybe buying an external hard
drive
> could b
you want, you probably should worry too much about
60%. If you were inclined to reinstall, you could try putting /usr on
it's own partition. This way, should it reach capacity, / would be
filled and crash your system.
<>
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 12:22, Kapil Khanna wrote:
> I rece
I recently installed Redhat on an old P2 laptop. It works like a champ and i
am extremely pleased. However the laptop only comes with 2.5 GB of hard drive
space. Using the system over the last couple of weeks has the drive at 60% of
its capacity. Thats making me anxious that someday i will have to
piece of cake.
Do not install both versions via RPM one after the other. Install one via rpm
first, rename java directory to some name you would like.
Install 2nd version via rpm now. You should have 2 distinct versions of java
on ur filesystem.
Place the appropriate path to the version of java tha
This is what i am seeing in the /var/log/maillog
Feb 28 04:01:04 localhost procmail[6519]: Error while writing to
"/root/.procmail/log"
Has anybody seen this before?
What surprises me is that there is no directory called .procmail under root.
There can be a .procmail file in user specific directori
I fixed the authentication warnings part by adding apache to the
/etc/mail/trusted-users file.
However i do not yet have the IP masquerading part working yet.
Kapil Khanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I reverted to back to my sendmail.cf back and tried using the macro as you
suggested
MASQUER
-Kapil
"Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kapil Khanna
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 12:01 AM
> Subject: IP masquerading not working for sendmail
>
>
> I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sen
Nate
Sorry that was a typo. It is DM and not DN.
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kapil Khanna said:
> I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sent from this
> machine as mydomain.com
> According to the docs i set the DN entry to be DNmydomain.com in the
I am running RHAT 7.2. I want to masquerade email being sent from this machine
as mydomain.com
According to the docs i set the DN entry to be DNmydomain.com in the
/etc/sendmail.cf file. I restarted sendmail (/etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail
restart).
I tried sending an email from this box. However masque
I recently ran the Redhat network agent. It downloaded 340+ errata, a couple
of them affected apache.
I noticed some strange behavior. A few of the errata failed to be applied.
There were some dependency issues with them. One of the failures were related
to an apache errata. After a couple of hours
Michael,
What log can i post so that you and others can check what dependencies caused
failures on the up2date.
Thanks.
Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:04:45 -0700, Kapil Khanna wrote:
> What can i do to s
:
On Thursday, 27 February 2003 12:02 PM, Kapil Khanna [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I just registered with the Redhat network via the web interface. My system
got
> set up just fine. It found 120 errata's for all the packages installed on
my
> machine. I selected all the errat
I just registered with the Redhat network via the web interface. My system got
set up just fine. It found 120 errata's for all the packages installed on my
machine. I selected all the erratas to be upadted. It has assigned a check in
time of X.
Does that mean that at time X, my linux system will a
After having an uptime of a couple of days Redhat 7.2 started to slow down. I
have it installed on an IBM think pad. For networking i have a linksys
wireless card installed.
On running top i saw that the process X was consuming 90+% of CPU time.
I watched this for a couple of hours but nothing chan
23 matches
Mail list logo
