At 01:40 PM 5/26/2005, Mathew Quaife wrote:
>No one better, out local Cell Phone company took care of a customer
>service issue by telling them that they doubled the power of their
>phone in the computer system, and that should fix the reception
>issue. Sad part was, the guy bought it, it did w
No one better, out local Cell Phone company took care of a customer service issue by telling them that they doubled the power of their phone in the computer system, and that should fix the reception issue. Sad part was, the guy bought it, it did work better for a few days, not that propogation
I knew a guy that was convinced that when he wasn't making the
repeater, he could make his mobile rig put out more power by squezing
the PTT key harder. That worked ok in his mind until he snaped the
PTT switch off the mic's printed circuit board and nearly destroyed
the plastic housing.
Anyway,
them that it was a accident and 3 yrs have gone
by..
Brent
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Matda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:53 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: What would be gained in a duplexer change:
Curiosity
> Usually, the perso
Usually, the person that complains is 30 air miles from the site,
running a scratchy-talkie on low power and rubber duck, and lying in
bed.
And he wonders why he can't get the machine full scale...
Steve, KE4MOB
>
> This is one thing that really makes me want to not work on
repeaters.
>
> I
26, 2005 8:44
AM
To:
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
Re: What would be gained in a duplexer change: Curiosity
Dave Nixon wrote:
and then start talking again between themselves, forgetting that you wanted to turn the machine off
Ah
Dave Nixon wrote:
and then start talking again between themselves, forgetting that you wanted to turn the machine off
Ah The sound of the PTT Disable Switch slamming in the downward
position
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on
>You go up to the site to make an adjustment ot take a power reading and as
>soon as you go to turn off the repeater, "Bill" and "Bob" (names have been
>changed to protect the guilty) start talking on the machine after hopping
>over from another repeater. You let them talk a few minutes but realiz
I enjoyed the comment about not touching anything and you will get
comments that the repeater is not working as well as it used to. Here's
another one:
You go up to the site to make an adjustment ot take a power reading and as
soon as you go to turn off the repeater, "Bill" and "Bob" (names have
Chuck Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I was counting on another factor -- you tell someone you made a
change
and then ask them if they notice. There's always someone that will
say they
notice - even if you did nothing.
This is one thing that really makes me want to not work on
r
e that will say they notice - even if you did nothing.ChuckWB2EDV- Original Message - From: "Laryn Lohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:24 PMSubject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: What would be gained in a duplexer change: Curiosity> --- In Repeater-B
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:24 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: What would be gained in a duplexer change:
Curiosity
> --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Kelsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> 99% of the users would never notice it, assuming
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Kelsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 99% of the users would never notice it, assuming that reducing the
can count
> didn't cause any desense.
Not to argue your answer Chuck because you are absolutely right. I
will go a step farther and say that 100
13 matches
Mail list logo
