Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field Privileges

2013-07-11 Thread Tim Wiley
On 07/10/2013 06:42 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote: * What's unexpected is if a user has SeeCustomField, but not ModifyCustomField on a mandatory CF, at ticket creation they get the error "MyCustomField: Input must match [Mandatory]" even though it's not displayed & they don't have modify rights on it.

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field Privileges

2013-07-10 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 07/10/2013 02:33 PM, Tim Wiley wrote: > I'm setting the validation field in the Basic CF config to "(?#Mandatory)." Ok, good. > * What's unexpected is if a user has SeeCustomField, but not > ModifyCustomField on a mandatory CF, at ticket creation they get the > error "MyCustomField: Input must

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field Privileges

2013-07-10 Thread Tim Wiley
On 07/10/2013 01:51 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote: On 07/09/2013 05:08 PM, Tim Wiley wrote: Not letting one group of users see a set of CFs is possible with RT's rights, provided you haven't granted rights too widely at the global level. You may need to rejigger some of your rights first to be less g

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field Privileges

2013-07-10 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 07/09/2013 05:08 PM, Tim Wiley wrote: >> Not letting one group of users see a set of CFs is possible with RT's >> rights, provided you haven't granted rights too widely at the global >> level. You may need to rejigger some of your rights first to be less >> global and more role/group/object spe

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field Privileges

2013-07-09 Thread Tim Wiley
On 07/09/2013 04:43 PM, Thomas Sibley wrote: On 07/09/2013 02:20 PM, Tim Wiley wrote: GroupA are workers in & effectively own Queue1. GroupA requested a number of custom fields for their queue that help facilitate better reporting on tickets. Because of the reporting nature of these custom fie

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field Privileges

2013-07-09 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 07/09/2013 02:20 PM, Tim Wiley wrote: > GroupA are workers in & effectively own Queue1. GroupA requested a > number of custom fields for their queue that help facilitate better > reporting on tickets. Because of the reporting nature of these custom > fields, GroupA has requested that only they

Re: [rt-users] mandatory custom field

2009-11-13 Thread Ken Crocker
Alexandre, Your question is odd. Are you saying you HAVE the CF's or WANT to have some CF's? Also, if a CF is defined as "Mandatory", that is indicated when creating/updating a ticket. This is explained in the RT Essentials book. Kenn LBNL On 11/13/2009 7:40 AM, Alexandre PIASER wrote: > Hell

Re: [rt-users] mandatory custom field

2009-11-13 Thread Jerrad Pierce
> I have some custom fields (mandatory and optional). > I would differentiate between mandatory and optional fields. I would add > a mark or something else near mandatory fields. > Is it possible ? Doesn't the system already do this in the italics below the field name? If not, make a local version

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory custom field

2008-11-07 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
Will be fixed in 3.8.2 and 3.6.8 - patches are in the repo. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Monti gmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I added a new custom field named "Severiy" with Type "Select one value" and > Validatione = Mandatory. > I want SelfService ticktes to be filled with the ma

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory custom field

2008-08-19 Thread Monti gmail
Hi Scott, I've tried that but still, when I open a new ticket from SelfService although the CF is mandatory, I can submit without valuse to the CF. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:57 PM, scott smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Monti gmail wrote: > >> Hi, >> I added a new custom field named "Severi

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory custom field

2008-08-19 Thread scott smith
Monti gmail wrote: > Hi, > > I added a new custom field named "Severiy" with Type "Select one value" > and Validatione = Mandatory. > I want SelfService ticktes to be filled with the mandatory new custom > filed but it is not the case. > New ticket could be open without providing a value for my

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field

2008-03-11 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Scott, Very good. I'll get it. Kenn LBNL On 3/11/2008 10:39 AM, Scott Lambert wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:05:09AM -0700, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >> Stephen & Steve, >> >> Thanks a bunch, really. I'm just now learning some perl, so a lot of >> stuff confuses me. I think I se

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field

2008-03-11 Thread Scott Lambert
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:05:09AM -0700, Kenneth Crocker wrote: > Stephen & Steve, > > Thanks a bunch, really. I'm just now learning some perl, so a lot of > stuff confuses me. I think I see it, so double thanks. You helped me fix > a problem AND taught me something. This provides a usef

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field

2008-03-11 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Stephen & Steve, Thanks a bunch, really. I'm just now learning some perl, so a lot of stuff confuses me. I think I see it, so double thanks. You helped me fix a problem AND taught me something. Kenn LBNL On 3/11/2008 6:19 AM, Stephen Turner wrote: > At Monday 3/10/2008 05:10 PM, Kenn

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field

2008-03-11 Thread Stephen Turner
At Monday 3/10/2008 05:10 PM, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >Stephen, > > > Why does yours have so much code? I just tried adding the > '?' at the end, in front of the '$' and it still doesn't work. > Where would I make a change to yours in order to get 4 positions for year? > >Kenn >LBNL Kenn,

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field

2008-03-10 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Stephen, Why does yours have so much code? I just tried adding the '?' at the end, in front of the '$' and it still doesn't work. Where would I make a change to yours in order to get 4 positions for year? Kenn LBNL On 3/10/2008 11:06 AM, Stephen Turner wrote: > At Monday 3/10/2008 12:

Re: [rt-users] Mandatory Custom Field

2008-03-10 Thread Stephen Turner
At Monday 3/10/2008 12:31 PM, Kenneth Crocker wrote: >To all, > > > We have a Custom Field called "Need-By Date". It is applied > to only a >few Queues. In order to ensure the format entered is consistent, I put >the following "(?#Date)^\d{2}/\d{2}/\d{4}$" into the Validation field. >The r