*Company*
Fast-growing software company located downtown.
*Perks*
Doubled in size in the past 6 months
Huge career growth opportunities
Talented team
*Job – Ruby on Rails Developer (javascript, PostgreSQL)*
· We are seeking a Rails Developer to work on our core platform.
·
required Telecommuting not available
If you are interested! please reach out to me AT
Lisa(at)gatestaffing(dot)com
Lisa
Lisa Vella-Alvarado | Principal
GATE Staffing, LLC.
19 West 36th Street -12th Floor
New York, NY 10018
(646)-374-0912-direct
(813)-334-5959-cell
l...@gatestaffing.com
Looking for some great mid and senior level Ruby on Rails developers to
join a great team working for a client in the Energy Management space.
Great company staying on top of the lastest technologies. Looking for
people comfortable working across all tiers of a web application.
JavaScript/JQue
Hi,
My company Tibco Software, located in Palo Alto, has UI Architect
position available. Can I post this with your organization?
Lisa Greenawalt
Recruiter
Tibco Software
650-846-8763
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk"
Thanks for the link Zt Di.
@selected_state = state_id.to_i works.
This is because state_id = params[:state][:state_id] returns a string.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Thanks a lot for the replies! I guess I kind of prefer the
before_filter method a little bit because then I don't have to
replicate the redirect_if_not_found logic in each restricted action.
Thanks again!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
Hi, I just have a "best practices" question. I'd like to block users
that don't own a particular resource from performing edit/update/
destroy actions on it. Here's how I currently do it:
## User has many resources, of different types
--- resource_controller.rb ---
before_filter :requ
Oooh, that clarified a few things. Thanks Andrew!
On Dec 18, 4:58 am, Andrew Porter wrote:
> Lisa Klein wrote:
> > book.user_id = @user.id
>
> > Is this the way it's supposed to be done? I know that it's preferred
> > to interact with dependent resour
I have a Book resource that belongs both to a User and to an Isbn.
What is the recommended way of building a new Book record in this type
of situation?
class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :isbn
end
Currently I'm doing the following:
@isbn = Isbn.find(...)
book = @isb
9 matches
Mail list logo
