Nope, just an alias.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:48 AM, fuzzy wrote:
> Thanks Mirri for you post ... I had a look at the link ... are they
> saying that 'specify' has now been superceded by 'it'?
>
>
> On Jan 18, 10:17 am, Mirri Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
`specify` is actually just the same as `it`. It's just there because
sometimes it reads better. See here:
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/blob/master/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb#L82
- Mirri
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:22 PM, wrote:
> Hey fuzzy,
>
> I think the first thing that is may
Hi Soichi,
You can temporarily do `if @plan.save!` to raise an error instead of just
having it return false and not give you any feedback. Doing this is okay
because you should not bother testing your validations as far as the
controller is concerned (you do that on your model). In any case, try t
On your controller, use `create!` to see what is preventing the save.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Soichi Ishida wrote:
> Rails 3.1.3
> rspec-rails (2.11.4)
> rspec 2.11.1
>
> I am new to rspec. I don't quite understand tests for POST create part.
>
> I have generated scaffold, and simultan
I won't generally go with that approach:
- Skill.all can get big
- You're doing 2 queries by default plus the array subtraction
It's better to just use a scope or a class method on Skill or some service
class in my opinion but for brevity nothing tops that. The results would
(should) be cached an
weird, it's like saying a =
1; a.should == 1.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Mirri Kim wrote:
> Hi there, try:
>
> PdfHelper.should_recieve(:create_pdf).with(user, file)
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Adnan wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is
Hi there, try:
PdfHelper.should_recieve(:create_pdf).with(user, file)
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Adnan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is my *pdf_helper.rb* => http://pastebin.com/QU1kTKXk. I want to
> test, if self.create method can take more than two arguments. But, when I
> try to run my test
Hi, there are links to the release notes at the bottom of that page (e.g.,
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/3_2_release_notes.html).
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, RVince wrote:
> Carlos, I keep going over this url, but I dont see any reference to
> version changes here. What am I missing? Thank
Just a reminder: it's just specific with the find(). find_by_* will return
nil unless you add a ! (e,g,, find_by_name!()) then it also returns the
exception
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:55 AM, John Merlino wrote:
> ok I thought it would return nil
>
> thanks for response
>
> On Jun 19, 8:33 pm, Fer
9 matches
Mail list logo
