[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-11-13 Thread Steve Mills
Alexandr Kim wrote in post #960797: > just remove rake.gemspec and it will work. It worked for me at least. > > http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=48830&forum_id=37643 Thanks for the tip - it worked! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-11-11 Thread Alexandr Kim
just remove rake.gemspec and it will work. It worked for me at least. http://rubyforge.org/forum/forum.php?thread_id=48830&forum_id=37643 On Oct 3, 12:36 pm, Steve Mills wrote: > I am evaluating RubyMine but am getting the following rake issue... > > C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:340:in

Re: [Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread radhames brito
@steve Keep learning with rubymine, the thing is once you learn how easy rails is you will see that IDEs just get in the way , but you have to learn that by your self we cant tell you that, eventually you will see that for rails the only thing that a IDE is good for is to search for file quickly.

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
Hi Marnen. I'm never combative or hostile - that's not my nature. However, when I've got a huge investment in one tool, I need to be convinced before switching horses because it always results in a lot of work to effectively get to where I already was with my favoured tool, and my time is sprea

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
[Repost of something that apparently got eaten.] Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #955224: > Steve Mills wrote in post #955220: >> The content was... >> >> diff --git a/tool/rbinstall.rb b/tool/rbinstall.rb >> index 266d717..0e9f39a 100755 >> --- a/tool/rbinstall.rb >> +++ b/tool/rbinstall.rb >>

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Steve Mills wrote in post #955228: > Unfortunately, I'm such a newbie to this, I don't have git, Then get it. > don't see > why I need it when I use subversion for version control, Because it's a better VCS than Subversion is. Subversion uses a less powerful paradigm (centralized, whereas Git

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
Unfortunately, I'm such a newbie to this, I don't have git, don't see why I need it when I use subversion for version control, and it doesn't get automatically installed with Ruby. The information that led me to this patch was Ruby's inability to recognise that Rake 0.8.7 had been installed. Ap

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Steve Mills wrote in post #955220: > The content was... > > diff --git a/tool/rbinstall.rb b/tool/rbinstall.rb > index 266d717..0e9f39a 100755 > --- a/tool/rbinstall.rb > +++ b/tool/rbinstall.rb > @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ install?(:ext, :comm, :gem) do > version = open(src) {|f| f.find {|s| /^\s*\w

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
The content was... diff --git a/tool/rbinstall.rb b/tool/rbinstall.rb index 266d717..0e9f39a 100755 --- a/tool/rbinstall.rb +++ b/tool/rbinstall.rb @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ install?(:ext, :comm, :gem) do version = open(src) {|f| f.find {|s| /^\s*\w*VERSION\s*=(?!=)/ =~ s}} or next version =

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Steve Mills wrote in post #955214: > P.S. I should also have mentioned I'm working with RubyMine to learn how > to build Rails web apps. Drop RubyMine, at least for now. You can go back to it later, but you should absolutely not be using an IDE for learning Rails. Just work with a good text ed

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Steve Mills wrote in post #955213: > Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #955209: >> Steve Mills wrote in post #955200: >> [...] >>If you can point me to a patch you've found, I may be >> able to be of more help. >> > > Thanks - I'm working both in Windows and Ubuntu - but Windows primarily > because

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
P.S. I should also have mentioned I'm working with RubyMine to learn how to build Rails web apps. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrail

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #955209: > Steve Mills wrote in post #955200: > [...] >If you can point me to a patch you've found, I may be > able to be of more help. > Thanks - I'm working both in Windows and Ubuntu - but Windows primarily because that's where my Development Environment is -

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Steve Mills wrote in post #955200: [...] > There are patches available to fix it but the authors assume that we all > know how to apply a patch whereas newbies like myself haven't a clue - > yes we can download the patch, but we don't know how to apply it. > > Any hints? :) Learn how to apply a pa

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote in post #955129: > Bad idea. Ruby 1.9.1 is not supposed to work reliably with Rails. Use > 1.9.2 or 1.8.7. 1.9.2 doesn't work. 1.8.7 is too old to work with the tools I'm using. So far 1.9.1 is working with no problems. Like the person before me, I tried to get help

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Steve Mills wrote in post #955083: > Hi Kevin. > > In the end I uninstalled Ruby 1.9.2 and installed version 1.9.1 and the > problem went away. > > Kind Regards > Steve Bad idea. Ruby 1.9.1 is not supposed to work reliably with Rails. Use 1.9.2 or 1.8.7. Best, -- Marnen Laibow-Koser http://www

Re: [Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread jason white
If you are going to develop in Rails3, I don't think Ruby 1.9.1 is compatible Jason On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Steve Mills wrote: > Hi Kevin. > > In the end I uninstalled Ruby 1.9.2 and installed version 1.9.1 and the > problem went away. > > Kind Regards > Steve > > -- > Posted via http:

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread Steve Mills
Hi Kevin. In the end I uninstalled Ruby 1.9.2 and installed version 1.9.1 and the problem went away. Kind Regards Steve -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group,

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-18 Thread eventhough
Steve, were you able to find a solution for this? I am dealing with the same exact error. It says rake-0.8.7 installed fine but I get an error that it can't find the executable. Thanks, Kevin On Oct 3, 1:32 pm, Steve Mills wrote: > OK. I checked these things. > > gem environment says:- > === >

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-03 Thread Steve Mills
OK. I checked these things. gem environment says:- === C:\Users\Steve>cd \ruby192 C:\Ruby192>gem environment RubyGems Environment: - RUBYGEMS VERSION: 1.3.7 - RUBY VERSION: 1.9.2 (2010-08-18 patchlevel 0) [i386-mingw32] - INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1 - RUBY EXECU

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-03 Thread Radhames Brito
> > Running rake --help --trace doesn't produce anything extra (presumably > because rake itself is not being executed). > > So now I've run out of ideas :( > > Kind Regards > Steve Is this your only ruby in the system? run gem environment to see where are your gems been installed. go to th

[Rails] Re: Newbe: rails version issue

2010-10-03 Thread Steve Mills
Thanks for the reply. Here's a console example... === C:\Ruby192\bin>rake --help --trace C:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:340:in `bin_path': can't find executable r ake for rake-0.8.7 (Gem::Exception) from C:/Ruby192/bin/rake:19:in `' === The various articles I have read on the subje