Re: [Rails] Re: Re: Mac and Rails

2010-06-19 Thread Walter McGinnis
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Fernando Perez wrote: >>> P.S. +1 to whoever mentioned Homebrew. Finally an alternative to >>> macports that I can be happy with. self => "macports hater" >> >> Really, what's the deal about macports? I find it works quite well. What >>

[Rails] Re: Re: Mac and Rails

2010-06-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Fernando Perez wrote: >> P.S. +1 to whoever mentioned Homebrew. Finally an alternative to >> macports that I can be happy with. self => "macports hater" > > Really, what's the deal about macports? I find it works quite well. What > problems does homebrew solve? Yeah. I don't much like MacPorts

[Rails] Re: Re: Mac and Rails

2010-06-18 Thread Fernando Perez
> P.S. +1 to whoever mentioned Homebrew. Finally an alternative to > macports that I can be happy with. self => "macports hater" Really, what's the deal about macports? I find it works quite well. What problems does homebrew solve? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received thi

[Rails] Re: Re: Mac and Rails

2010-06-18 Thread Robert Walker
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> How do you set up Mongrel that's easier (from scratch) than the above? >> I'm >> assuming you're not just working on a single Rails site and just do >> "rails >> s" or "script/server" when you need it up (I have locally running >> websites >> available all the time)

[Rails] Re: Re: Mac and Rails

2010-06-18 Thread Marnen Laibow-Koser
Andy Jeffries wrote: >> >> > Use Apache locally too. It's simple, Apache is already installed on >> > Snow >> > Leopard. Install Passenger and configure it (which you'll need to learn >> > how >> > to do for production anyway). >> >> What a waste of effort IMHO. I've never used anything but Mongr