On Feb 11, 7:46 pm, Greg Donald wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
> Because I build more than just toy apps. Sometimes I have complex
> logic for what effect to show, or what to do when an exception is
> raised. Sometimes the JS is generated, like:
>
> page << "$j(fun
Thanks. I was not sure if there was a totally transparent way to do.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Frederick Cheung <
frederick.che...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 11, 4:57 pm, Me wrote:
> > Is there a way to use any kind of helper or something if you do the
> > same thing on every rjs cal
On Feb 11, 4:57 pm, Me wrote:
> Is there a way to use any kind of helper or something if you do the
> same thing on every rjs call? Like render a flash box div?
if in a helper you stick something like
def rjs_flash
update_page do |page|
...
end
end
Then in your templates you can do
Ok, does anyone know how to do a page[:div].replace_html on every ajax
call, helper or something like that?
On Feb 11, 1:15 pm, Greg Donald wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
>
> wrote:
> > Why do you prefer RJS to writing JavaScript?
>
> RJS is a template rendering s
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Chris Habgood wrote:
>> " Why do you need RJS? "
>>
>> It is an ajax call
>
> That doesn't require RJS.
Why the war on RJS? It's been working great for me since Rails 0.8.
--
Greg Donald
destiney.com | gregdonald.com
--
You rece
"That doesn't require RJS."
Ok, this is an early build out I do not want updates in the controller ase
may have additional stuff in the future and i do not want the controller
cluttered up.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Chris Habgood wrote:
> > " Why do you need
Chris Habgood wrote:
> " Why do you need RJS? "
>
> It is an ajax call
That doesn't require RJS.
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
mar...@marnen.org
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
" Why do you need RJS? "
It is an ajax call
On Feb 11, 12:04 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> For the second time: please quote when replying!
>
> Chris Habgood wrote:
> > Ok, how would I implement the manual JS version to get called
> > automatically on every rjs render?
>
> Why do you need RJS
For the second time: please quote when replying!
Chris Habgood wrote:
> Ok, how would I implement the manual JS version to get called
> automatically on every rjs render?
Why do you need RJS?
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
mar...@marnen.org
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-for
Ok, how would I implement the manual JS version to get called
automatically on every rjs render?
On Feb 11, 11:56 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Please quote when replying -- otherwise we don't know what you're
> responding to.
>
> Chris Habgood wrote:
> > It is a full ajax site. flash gets re
Please quote when replying -- otherwise we don't know what you're
responding to.
Chris Habgood wrote:
> It is a full ajax site. flash gets rendered on every call, nothing
> in it if it is empty anyway.
So what? That's irrelevant to the advice I gave, isn't it?
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
h
It is a full ajax site. flash gets rendered on every call, nothing
in it if it is empty anyway.
On Feb 11, 11:06 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Chris Habgood wrote:
> > Is there a way to use any kind of helper or something if you do the
> > same thing on every rjs call? Like render a flash b
Chris Habgood wrote:
> Is there a way to use any kind of helper or something if you do the
> same thing on every rjs call? Like render a flash box div?
Why not write JavaScript directly in unobtrusive style, and call the
appropriate function as necessary?
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://ww
13 matches
Mail list logo
