On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM, ben wiseley wrote:
> No - I didn't. I didn't realize we were supposed to do that but I'll
> start. Sorry about that. I just figured that was a "plugins need to be
> updated" issue and not a Rails 3 issue.
>
> -ben
>
>
Ben, it's simply recommendation so that th
No - I didn't. I didn't realize we were supposed to do that but I'll start.
Sorry about that. I just figured that was a "plugins need to be updated"
issue and not a Rails 3 issue.
-ben
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:17 AM, ben wiseley wrot
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:17 AM, ben wiseley wrote:
> I just had to make a similar decision. In order to get something going
> quickly I stuck with 2.3.5. Rails 3 seems great, but most of the plugins I
> tried had issues so I decided to wait.
>
> -ben
>
>
Ben, did you file tickets against each
I just had to make a similar decision. In order to get something going
quickly I stuck with 2.3.5. Rails 3 seems great, but most of the plugins I
tried had issues so I decided to wait.
-ben
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:43 PM, princezuda
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:43 PM, princezuda wrote:
> hey,
> I am making a new project, and I've been having trouble deciding
> between rails and 3.5 and rails 3.0.0 beta one. I realize that rails
> 3.0.0 should be out of beta sometime mid-summer, which is around the
> time I expect to launch a
hey,
I am making a new project, and I've been having trouble deciding
between rails and 3.5 and rails 3.0.0 beta one. I realize that rails
3.0.0 should be out of beta sometime mid-summer, which is around the
time I expect to launch a project. I try to think ahead, and in many
ways it makes sense
6 matches
Mail list logo
