Re: [Rails] sass-rails

On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 7:10:41 PM UTC-5, Ariel Juodziukynas wrote: > > sass/scss files shouldn't be linked by your website, these files have to > be compiled into standard .css files with sprockets, webpacker or any other > sass compiler. > > Usually, if you use sass-rails (or sassc

Re: [Rails] sass-rails

On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 7:10:41 PM UTC-5, Ariel Juodziukynas wrote: > > sass/scss files shouldn't be linked by your website, these files have to > be compiled into standard .css files with sprockets, webpacker or any other > sass compiler. > > Usually, if you use sass-rails (or sassc

Re: [Rails] sass-rails

sass/scss files shouldn't be linked by your website, these files have to be compiled into standard .css files with sprockets, webpacker or any other sass compiler. Usually, if you use sass-rails (or sassc-rails on newer rails version) or webpacker, both gems should take care of compiling the asset

[Rails] sass-rails

What's supposed to cause rails to take application to mean application.scss ? The problem I'm having is my stylesheet is named application.scss and rails is looking for application.css If I name it as application.scss in stylesheet_link_tag then it looks for application.css.scss -- You receive

Re: [Rails] Sass-rails

Thank you for your feedback Sasha and Walter. On Sunday, March 10, 2019 at 8:59:25 PM UTC-4, Sasha Boginsky wrote: > > Hi, > > I just switch it to sassc-rails and it works basically the same. > > Sasha > > > > On Mar 10, 2019, at 8:02 PM, Walter Lee Davis > wrote: > > > > > >> On Mar 10, 20

Re: [Rails] Sass-rails

Hi, I just switch it to sassc-rails and it works basically the same. Sasha > On Mar 10, 2019, at 8:02 PM, Walter Lee Davis wrote: > > >> On Mar 10, 2019, at 6:17 PM, brainiacs...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I was just curious as to what everyone is using since sass-rails is

Re: [Rails] Sass-rails

> On Mar 10, 2019, at 6:17 PM, brainiacs...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I was just curious as to what everyone is using since sass-rails is > depreciating and if I add a ui kit it should change the look and feel of the > app without have to change a great deal of the css. Correct?

[Rails] Sass-rails

Hi Everyone, I was just curious as to what everyone is using since sass-rails is depreciating and if I add a ui kit it should change the look and feel of the app without have to change a great deal of the css. Correct? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: [Rails] sass-rails not in Gemfile for Rails 5.0.0.beta1

Hi On Sun, Jan 17, 2016, at 01:29, R Bruce Bicknell wrote: > I've just started messing around with Rails 5.0.0.beta1 and in diffing > around, I've noticed that sass-rails is not in the Gemfile. > > Has it been omitted for a reason? > it's a (fixed) bug[1] [1] https://github.com/rails/rails/is

[Rails] sass-rails not in Gemfile for Rails 5.0.0.beta1

I've just started messing around with Rails 5.0.0.beta1 and in diffing around, I've noticed that sass-rails is not in the Gemfile. Has it been omitted for a reason? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from thi

[Rails] sass-rails + sprockets seems to work just fine (for straight-up CSS)?

Sass-rails is pretty emphatic about not using Sprockets' `require` directives: "Sprockets provides some directives that are placed inside of comments called require, require_tree, and require_self. DO NOT USE THEM IN YOUR SASS/SCSS FILES." But I wanted to include a vendored CSS file without having