On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Well, it seems sage-devel approves, so term = coeff * monomial it is.
Adjugé, vendu!
Thanks for handling this.
> I've spent today preparing a patch to do this, and I think I've done it.
> I have to run now, but tomorrow I'll put up
Hi,
Given the recent discussion on adding generic group features, it was
way time for someone to go one step further: to enable extension types
to inherit code from categories, so that we could at last start to
systematically put generic code in the categories instead of the "old"
abstract
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> For the record: I added in PS a discussion with the MuPAD team in
> 1998 ..., about the same issue :-) I would love to see it resolved
> once for all. Please make a call on sage-devel, and if there is a
> consensus for standardizing for term = coeff * mo
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:08:13PM +0100, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> I am currently experiencing a small conflict in the sage-combinat
> tree. See below for the content of the reject file.
Please try again after a sage -combinat qselect. The iwahori hecke
patch and a couple others are already guarde
Dear Jason,
Dear Nicolas,
I am currently experiencing a small conflict in the sage-combinat
tree. See below for the content of the reject file.
Sébastien
sla...@pol:~/sage-4.3/devel/sage-combinat$ hg qpop -a
aucun patch appliqué
sla...@pol:~/sage-4.3/devel/sage-combinat$ hg qselect
no active gu
Hi Anne,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:49:38PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I recently asked Nicolas whether it is easy to amend the Iwahori Hecke
> algebra code to mod out by further relations? For example to impose
> T_i T_{i+1} T_i = 0 or something like this. He suggested to discuss this
