bump wrote:
What are you thinking of including in the chapter on crystals?
First let me say that if you (or some subset of you, Brant,
Nicolas ...)
wanted to work on this chapter that would be great. What I would
write would be strictly classical crystals.
I would like it to to contain some in
> What are you thinking of including in the chapter on crystals?
First let me say that if you (or some subset of you, Brant,
Nicolas ...)
wanted to work on this chapter that would be great. What I would
write would be strictly classical crystals.
I would like it to to contain some introductory ma
Dear Dan,
This is indeed a very impressive tutorial and well-written.
Thank you for doing this.
What are you thinking of including in the chapter on crystals?
Best wishes,
Anne
bump wrote:
In trac #8442 I posted a patch that makes a new tutorial called "Lie
Methods and Related Combinatorics
Hi Dan,
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:12 AM, bump wrote:
> Of course the documentation in the source files is essential. But
> although
> there is adequate documentation in the source files for someone who
> knows it
> is there and wants to dig, you don't get any sense of how to use the
> program
>
> I think this is something which should be discussed more widely on sage-devel.
> What do you think ?
> One question is where should we put those tutorials. During sage days 20, we
> had lost of newcommers to Sage so we started to write several tutorials. We
Are those tutorials available somewhe
Hi Dan,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 07:27:35PM -0800, bump wrote:
> In trac #8442 I posted a patch that makes a new tutorial called "Lie
> Methods and Related Combinatorics in Sage."
Wow !!! A lot a very good documentations ! Excellent ! I'll certainly reread
it. I'll probably learn more about
Hi Anne,
> Is it possible that one of your patches does not apply cleanly?
Of course it's not ;-) Please try again.
Sorry and Cheers,
Florent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to s
