In the first case, one would put the calculation of the module generators
into
def CrystalOfTableaux(cartan_type, shapes) ?
Or this would then also turn into a class so that it can have
__classcall__ and __init__ methods?
I'd say there would be a base class CrystalOfTableaux, whose role is
to
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 01:46:24PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Yes, indeed. When using the tensor product as I now implemented it,
> this is basically what appear except with a tensor sign. Perhaps
> this suffices?
This seems a good compromise indeed. And this can easily be later
improved if de
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 01:46:38PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >There are two ways out. Either the crystal C with mixed shapes should
> >be implemented as a direct sum of crystals each of which having only
> >one type of shape. Or the crystal C should have elements in different
> >classes. Namel
See crystal-spin-as.patch in the sage-combinat queue. One problem
is that currently all shapes in `shapes` need to be of the same type
for this to work, so one cannot mix nonspin shapes with spin shapes
in the same list. I do not currently need this for the applications
I have in mind, but to ha
On 1/23/11 8:37 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:20:27AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
What would be the best way to display columns of 1/2 width and mark them as
spin?
Could you choose a typical element, and try to draw here what could be
a good ascii art picture of
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:20:27AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >>What would be the best way to display columns of 1/2 width and mark
> >> them as spin?
> >
> >Could you choose a typical element, and try to draw here what could be
> >a good ascii art picture of it? And possibly provide some
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 06:28:58AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Well, since there was no answer, I already implemented it the first way.
It's a quick change to switch from one version to the other anyway.
> See crystal-spin-as.patch in the sage-combinat queue. One problem
> is that currently a
On 1/23/11 5:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:08:16AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
For the record: add_demo_how_to_contribute--foldme--sl.patch I had
already folded on my machine; so the problem is closed. Also, in the
mean time, Nicolas B. removed free_commutative_mono
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:08:16AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >For the record: add_demo_how_to_contribute--foldme--sl.patch I had
> >already folded on my machine; so the problem is closed. Also, in the
> >mean time, Nicolas B. removed free_commutative_monoid-nb.patch
>
> Are you sure this is f
On 1/22/11 1:58 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:40:23PM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
...
They all have a trivial reject.
For the record: add_demo_how_to_contribute--foldme--sl.patch I had
already folded on my machine; so the problem is closed. Also, in the
mean time, Ni
10 matches
Mail list logo
