On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:54:56PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Thank you so much! So that I understand for the future: __init__ always needs
> to take parent as an input for the element class?
Indeed.
> But it does not need to take all inputs that would be needed for a
> class call?
More prec
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:41:27AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Do posets have a latex method? Or can they only be viewed using .show()?
Apparently not:
sage: P = Posets().example()
sage: P._latex_
...
AttributeError: 'FiniteSetsOrderedByInclusion_with_category' object has no
a
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:02:54PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > By the way: the Sage-Combinat queue should currently apply smoothly on
> > 4.8, 5.0.beta2, and 5.0.beta4; maybe on 4.7.2.
>
> Hmm, there are some glitches, and I need to run to get the girls.
> Please wait one hour of so!
It s
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:42:06PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Dear Sage-Combinat developers,
>
> By the way: the Sage-Combinat queue should currently apply smoothly on
> 4.8, 5.0.beta2, and 5.0.beta4; maybe on 4.7.2.
Hmm, there are some glitches, and I need to run to get the girls.
P
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:55:42AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> On 2/17/12 12:13 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> >>> By the way: changing P.linear_extensions() to return an enumerated set
> >>> rather than a plain list could make sense, assuming there is no speed
> >>> loss. This might require a bit
Dear Sage-Combinat developers,
By the way: the Sage-Combinat queue should currently apply smoothly on
4.8, 5.0.beta2, and 5.0.beta4; maybe on 4.7.2.
To this end, I just worked on the sage-combinat script to let it
handle multiple developers version, like 5.0.beta2 and 5.0.beta4: #12530
P
On 2/17/12 12:13 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
>>> By the way: changing P.linear_extensions() to return an enumerated set
>>> rather than a plain list could make sense, assuming there is no speed
>>> loss. This might require a bit of cythonification; maybe using
>>> ClonableArray will be enough. It's s
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:39:14PM -0800, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> OK, it looks like permutations might be innocent and the real culprit
> might be e rational functions as suggested by Dima.
I profiled the last calculation with run_snake:
sage: run_snake("prod( (L[k]-x**c)/(
Hi Rishi,
It is a bug, I saw it reported on trac.sagemath.org previously, but
can't find it anymore.
Paul
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:46 PM, r Rishikesh wrote:
> In sage, the following succeeds.
>
> sage: Partition([2,0,1])
>
>
> I would expect this not to succeed. Is this a bug or there is a reaso
> > By the way: changing P.linear_extensions() to return an enumerated set
> > rather than a plain list could make sense, assuming there is no speed
> > loss. This might require a bit of cythonification; maybe using
> > ClonableArray will be enough. It's slightly backward incompatible (it
> > does
Do posets have a latex method? Or can they only be viewed using .show()?
Cheers,
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this gr
>>
>> I get trouble with TestSuite which only works when elements of the set
>> have parents. In particular it does not work in the following case
>> {{{
>> sage: from sage.sets.set_from_iterator import EnumeratedSetFromIterator
>> sage: E = EnumeratedSetFromIterator(graphs,
>> category=InfiniteEnu
On 2/16/12 3:26 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:41:52AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> But how do I do this? Implementing the analogue of the cores method (see
>> combinat-queue)
>> I get ...
>> TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'parent'
>
> See m
13 matches
Mail list logo
