On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:36:51AM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>trying to test my own files on sage 5.0, it seems that it takes many
>import statements. Some of them behave strangely :
>
>sage: import_statements(euler_phi)
>from sage.rings.arith import Number of positive intege
Hello,
trying to test my own files on sage 5.0, it seems that it takes many import
statements. Some of them behave strangely :
sage: import_statements(euler_phi)
from sage.rings.arith import Number of positive integers <=n but relatively
prime to n
sage: import_statements(QQ)
from sage.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:42:59AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >>Also from reading the documentation, the RSK implementation
> >>requires that the recording tableau be standard.
> >
> > For a Permutation, yes. On the other hand, Tableau.insert_word
> > explicitly gives examples of non s
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:07:02AM -0700, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
> I also found the same behavior (I don't know why it worked before).
>Thanks Nicolas for identifying the real problem. That doctest failure
>with .nabla() would have been a mystery forever.
That's my job :-)
I am sur
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:43:27AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I opened a ticket
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969
>
> For the record, this problem also occurs in plain sage-5.0 without the new
> symmetric function patch in the sage-combinat queue applied that Mike
> and I have
Hi Anne,
I also found the same behavior (I don't know why it worked before).
Thanks Nicolas for identifying the real problem. That doctest failure
with .nabla() would have been a mystery forever.
-Mike
On Friday, 18 May 2012 04:43:27 UTC-4, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Nicolas, thanks so much
Nicolas, thanks so much for figuring out where the problem is!
I opened a ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969
For the record, this problem also occurs in plain sage-5.0 without the new
symmetric function patch in the sage-combinat queue applied that Mike
and I have been working
On 5/17/12 7:33 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:51:52PM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>The 2-line notation for generalized permutations which are in bijection
>>with these matrices (as in Stanley EC II Ch 7). Are these the biwords
>>you're talking about?
>
>
