Hi!
On 2012-12-29, Simon King wrote:
> I will not have time in the next couple of hours - so, if one of you
> immediately understands what is happening, then please open a new
> ticket, making it a new dependency for #13864!
I opened #13882, which is ready for review.
Best regards,
Simon
--
Y
And LatticePolytope has various compile-time limits like the maximal number
of dimension and vertices before you hit a C assertion. Whereas Polyhedron
has no limits within your CPU/Memory bounds.
Starting with Sage-5.6 the Polyhedron class also supports the base ring ZZ.
In the long run I'm en
Hi List,
I recognized some differences between polyhedron and lattice polytopes.
let p be a polyhedron, and l a lattice polytop. then:
first one:
p.vertices() gives a list of lists, i.e. a list of vertices
l.vertices() gives a matrix, where the columns define the vertices.
second:
let l be given
Hi!
The task #13864 coordinates work on getting a debug version of Sage,
i.e., so that SAGE_DEBUG=yes results in Python being built in debug
version, Singular being built with malloc instead of omalloc, and so on.
The good news: It works ...
The bad news: ... almost!
One of the remaining problem
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:58:36PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> > It looks #12215 had a positive review on trac at one point (4 months ago),
> > so that's probably the explanation for its location in the series file.
Indeed.
> Thanks for investigating this! If 12215 is rebased in the queue, on
I put my patch at the top of the queue and it's ok. (It was just a hunk).
Cheers,
Jean-Baptiste
Le samedi 29 décembre 2012 11:28:33 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>
> Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my
> patch. I only introduce new methods (written ju
Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my
patch. I only introduce new methods (written just before the latex method
indeed)
Is there any conflict with my patch when you apply the queue in full ? does
it say that it need to be rebased ? or is there just a hunk ?