n_facets, n_vertices
and more, which are not needed for lattice polytopes:
n_rays, n_Hrepresentation, n_Vrepresentation, n_equations,
n_inequalities, n_lines
greatz Johannes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to
with a reflexiv polytope or
not - so the other polytopeclass is not what i'm looking for.
I think i'll look through some of the tickets if i find something
interesting - computing the convex hull sounds or inside lattice points
sounds nice.
greatz Johannes
--
You received this messag
in and a latticepolytope is always defined in on a
lattice, so the points of the polytope just can be latticepoints. But I
dont see any connection to a real space, maybe, ca connection to the
quotientfield of the lattice or to the algebraic clousure of it.
greatz Johannes
--
You received this message
sentence of ref-equality but in my eyes two polytopes
are equal, if they live in the same space (in this case, on the same
Lattice) and have the same edges.
Is there any reason, why its not implemented that way?
greatz Johannes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
