[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-02-21 Thread mmarco
I have updated ticket 12339. It now includes a basic implementation of free groups and finitely presented groups. It has limited functionality, and maybe not the best implementation, but it works. Please test it and do any comments that you consider relevant. -- You received this message because

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-02-21 Thread mmarco
I have updated ticket #12339. It includes a basic implementation of free groups and finitely presented groups. It has limited features, and maybe its not the best implementation possible, but it works. Please test it and do any relevant comments. -- You received this message because you are subsc

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
sorry, I actually looked here: http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~CHEVIE/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/k4-DM0trIC4J. To post

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Jean MICHEL
Hello, On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:58:38AM -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Given that Chevie needs Maple, it can be regarded as "highly optional". I think that you are confused about Chevie. There was a 'Maple part of Chevie' written in 1995 which needs maple to compute Green functions of red

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Nicolas Borie
Le lundi 23 janvier 2012 à 03:58 -0800, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > Given that Chevie needs Maple, it can be regarded as "highly > optional". Hello Dima, If you are a Chevie lover, you can already have it in Sage in a fully open-source way. As Jean pointed out, Chevie is also a GAP'3' <-- package

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Given that Chevie needs Maple, it can be regarded as "highly optional". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/19Vwvg8J9CoJ. To post

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-22 Thread Jean MICHEL
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:35:38PM +0100, Nicolas Borie wrote: > Le dimanche 22 janvier 2012 ? 11:37 -0800, mmarco a ?crit : > > I am trying to implement free groups, finitely presented groups and > > braid groups in sage. So far i have writen a proof of concept for the > > free groups (see ticket

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-22 Thread Nicolas Borie
Le dimanche 22 janvier 2012 à 11:37 -0800, mmarco a écrit : > I am trying to implement free groups, finitely presented groups and > braid groups in sage. So far i have writen a proof of concept for the > free groups (see ticket 12339), but i don't have any experience with > the category and coercio