On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:57:31AM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> > To summarize, and as was previously vaguely discussed on
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/msg/18c3926662cf5033,
> > we would love to aim progressively at:
> >
> >sage: sage? # quickref
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> To summarize, and as was previously vaguely discussed on
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/msg/18c3926662cf5033,
> we would love to aim progressively at:
>
>sage: sage? # quick
Dear Dan, Jason, Minh, Sage devs,
Please find below a discussion on the appropriate location for tutorials.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:12:29AM -0800, bump wrote:
> > One question is where should we put those tutorials. During sage days 20, we
> > had lost of newcommers to Sage so we start
bump wrote:
What are you thinking of including in the chapter on crystals?
First let me say that if you (or some subset of you, Brant,
Nicolas ...)
wanted to work on this chapter that would be great. What I would
write would be strictly classical crystals.
I would like it to to contain some in
> What are you thinking of including in the chapter on crystals?
First let me say that if you (or some subset of you, Brant,
Nicolas ...)
wanted to work on this chapter that would be great. What I would
write would be strictly classical crystals.
I would like it to to contain some introductory ma
Hi Dan,
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:12 AM, bump wrote:
> Of course the documentation in the source files is essential. But
> although
> there is adequate documentation in the source files for someone who
> knows it
> is there and wants to dig, you don't get any sense of how to use the
> program
>
> I think this is something which should be discussed more widely on sage-devel.
> What do you think ?
> One question is where should we put those tutorials. During sage days 20, we
> had lost of newcommers to Sage so we started to write several tutorials. We
Are those tutorials available somewhe
