Dear Mathieu,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 03:19:54PM -0700, Mathieu Guay-Paquet wrote:
>I started working on a design document with Sean Carrell (cc'ed) after
>Sage Days 38, but I don't think we opened any tickets before I got
>sidetracked with writing a thesis.
A very good reason
Hi Nicolas, Dan,
On Thursday, 23 August 2012 11:43:27 UTC-4, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> As for the room for improvement, for Weyl character rings, but also
> for everything using root systems intensively, like Weyl groups and
> the like, a big spot is the optimization of CombinatorialFreeModul
Dear Dan, dear Mathieu Guay-Paquet,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:40:24AM -0700, bump wrote:
>In a recent post in this thread, Savdeep Sethi pointed out that at least
>for certain computations
>LiE is much faster than Sage for decomposing tensor powers of
>representations. In
In a recent post in this thread, Savdeep Sethi pointed out that at least
for certain computations
LiE is much faster than Sage for decomposing tensor powers of
representations. In analyzing
why this is true, I tried replacing the current algorithm, which is the
product_on_basis method
of WeylCha
John H Palmieri
writes:
> Anyway, I just tried it out. The spkg-install file relies on the GNU
> version of 'mv', so it doesn't install on my mac without this change:
>
> diff --git a/spkg-install b/spkg-install
> --- a/spkg-install
> +++ b/spkg-install
> @@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ cd ..
> sed -i -e "s'$P
There is already an optional LiE spkg for Sage [1]. I don't know anything
about it, for example whether it even builds. But that would perhaps be a
place to start.
>
> [1] http://www.sagemath.org/packages/optional/lie-2.2.2.p4.spkg
>
> --
> John
>
Currently sage can do most everything that LiE
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:47:08 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:40:05 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
>>
>> Hi All!
>>
>> Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
>> Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:40:05 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
> Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
> Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality of LiE to Sage?
>
>
There is already an optional LiE spkg for Sage [1]. I don't know
