Hey,
Fixed.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:48:16 PM UTC-4, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi Travis,
>
> I think you broke the queue with sage-5.9.rc1. Could you please fix it
> immediately since we are working
> on patches. Perhaps you could put your patches further down in the queue
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Franco Saliola wrote:
$ hg qpush -a
> applying trac_14000-doctests.patch
> applying trac_7886_conjugacy_classes_combined.patch
> transaction abort!
> rollback completed
> cleaning up working directory...done
> abort: decoding near 'Javier López Peñ': 'ascii' codec
Le 22/02/2013 16:59, Travis Scrimshaw a écrit :
Hey Franco,
I noticed that this morning and fixed it (about an hour ago and it
was an error on every version caused by me).
I confirm that both of you are right!!!
This is fixed! But the sage -combinat script stop when applying the
queue (t
Hey Franco,
I noticed that this morning and fixed it (about an hour ago and it was
an error on every version caused by me).
Best,
Travis
On Friday, February 22, 2013 10:55:03 AM UTC-5, Franco Saliola wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Thanks to Travis, the queue now works again on 5.6!
>
Thanks for all your hard work, Travis.
But I'm afraid I have some bad news (followed by good news):
> sage -v
Sage Version 5.6, Release Date: 2013-01-21
> sage -combinat update
Thanks to Travis, the queue now works again on 5.6!
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Hey Franco and 5.6 combinat users,
Everything in the combinat queue should now be working for 5.6. Let me
know if there are any problems. Nicolas had 5.6 that I could run tests on.
Thank you for that.
Best,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hey Franco (and Andrew),
Could you post the reject file that you're getting so I'll know where to
look?
Thank you,
Travis
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:35:39 PM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hey Franco,
>These all percolate from #6495 not applying. Andrew also came across
> th
Hey Franco,
These all percolate from #6495 not applying. Andrew also came across
this problem (I think he upgraded) Tomorrow I will dig through and see if I
can find out what patch(es) are missing.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:50:45 PM UTC-5, Franco Saliola wrote:
>
>
> >
Hey Andrew,
Whoops. Thank you for catching and fixing that.
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:36:02 PM UTC-5, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that in the series file #13862 is incorrectly marked for merging
> in 5.7.beta2 whereas trac says that it is merged in 5.6-beta2.
Hi Nicolas!
I opened a ticket on trac. Unfortunately, the computer I normally email
from just went down, so communication is slightly handicapped right now.
Also, I wanted to start with the coproduct, and thus I did a sage -combinat
update, but the queue didn't apply. Since for some stupid re
Nicolas,
I'm apply the same guard to #6538. Let me know if there's a better
approach to this.
With #12925 applied, #6538 applies for me. Thus the queue should work now
(at least with respect to my patch).
Thanks,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi Travis,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 07:20:39AM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> I have a hunch as to what is going on with my patch. There's a
>dependency on Nicolas's 12925 tutorial patch which has been merged into
>5.2, thus it no longer appears in the patch queue. In partic
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:25:16PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I do not think there is support for symmetric functions in several alphabets
> yet,
> but I could be wrong.
To emulate symmetric functions in two alphabets, you can take tensor products:
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(QQ)
Hey,
I have a hunch as to what is going on with my patch. There's a
dependency on Nicolas's 12925 tutorial patch which has been merged into
5.2, thus it no longer appears in the patch queue. In particular it created
the combinat/tutorial.py file which my little change depends on. My hunch
is
Anne Schilling writes:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I rebased your patch. Since Mike and I touched sfa.py quite heavily during the
> past week (see also http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5457 ), there
> was a conflict, which I hope I resolved. Make sure I did not mess anything up.
> Your doctests do
Hi Travis,
Most likely someone touched the partition file during the last week during the
Sage Days
in a patch further down in the queue, which created the conflict. Please rebase
your
patch (or move it higher up and contact the people with whom your patch is in
conflict
in case yours already h
Hi Martin,
I rebased your patch. Since Mike and I touched sfa.py quite heavily during the
past week (see also http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5457 ), there
was a conflict, which I hope I resolved. Make sure I did not mess anything up.
Your doctests do not pass, but most likely this was a
Mike,
The only thing that has changed in trac_6538 in the past few days is to
combinat/tutorial.py. If you figure out what's wrong, let me know. I won't
be able to push/pull anything for sage in the next week because of the
proxy server I'm having to use and I'll be making my way to Tokyo. Th
Dear Mike,
Mike Zabrocki writes:
> Hi,
> We are in the last few hours of sage days and I had to disable a few patches.
> I didn't figure what the cause was in these cases, only that they weren't
> working
> for me now.
> We made changes on symmetric functions so I am sure that Martin's
> patch
Hi,
We are in the last few hours of sage days and I had to disable a few
patches.
I didn't figure what the cause was in these cases, only that they weren't
working
for me now.
We made changes on symmetric functions so I am sure that Martin's
patch is failing to apply at least partly because of th
The queue is applying to 5.0 fine for me. -Hugh
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 9:46:15 PM UTC+3, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1.
> Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lunch, so Chris,
> did you make changes since that break the queue?
>
>
Hi Travis,
For me everything applies fine under sage-5.1. Which version of sage are you
using?
You should upgrade to sage-5.1 most likely!
Anne
On 7/13/12 4:23 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Hey,
>I'm also getting an error when applying
> trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this rela
Hey,
I'm also getting an error when
applying trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch. Is this related?
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:46:15 PM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The patch queue is currently broken with sage-5.1.
> Nicolas claims that he fixed this before lu
I did have my patch applied, but now it seems to work (still with rc0 and
my patch for 6538 applied)...Maybe it was fixed in one of the pushes right
after. *shrugs* I don't know. In either case I no longer see the problem
either.
Travis
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:33:50 PM UTC-7, Anne Schill
On 5/15/12 12:18 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:41:51AM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>Okay, then its something with 5.rc0. However its moot since the support
>>for pre-5.x is dropped.
>
> Don't tell the others, but I am still running rc0!
Looking at the serie
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:41:51AM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>Okay, then its something with 5.rc0. However its moot since the support
>for pre-5.x is dropped.
Don't tell the others, but I am still running rc0!
>Thanks Nicolas and Florent for all your hard work!
:-)
Okay, then its something with 5.rc0. However its moot since the support for
pre-5.x is dropped.
Thanks Nicolas and Florent for all your hard work!
Best,
Travis
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:16:33 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Travis,
>
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:05:02PM -0700, Travis
On 5/15/12 12:32 AM, Christian Stump wrote:
> Hi all --
>
> I just see that finally (!!!) 5.0 is out:
> ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/sage/devel/index.html (you might want
> to choose a different mirror though). I am currently compiling it on
> Ubuntu 12.04 and OSX Lion with XCode 3.2 (?). Sinc
Hi all --
I just see that finally (!!!) 5.0 is out:
ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/sage/devel/index.html (you might want
to choose a different mirror though). I am currently compiling it on
Ubuntu 12.04 and OSX Lion with XCode 3.2 (?). Since nothing changed
since 5.0.rc1, I would propose to make
Travis,
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:05:02PM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>First off, when I try to apply the queue, I get the following conflict:
>>patching file doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst
>>Hunk #1 FAILED at 3
>>1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>
Hi Travis,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:05:02PM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>First off, when I try to apply the queue, I get the following conflict:
>patching file doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst
>Hunk #1 FAILED at 3
>1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>
Hey Nicolas,
First off, when I try to apply the queue, I get the following conflict:
patching file doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst.rej
patch failed, unable to continue (try -v)
patch fai
Sorry! I should have been aware that I should check for conflicts. I will
be more careful in the future!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-co
I also installed the combinat queue on a new 6.4.2, and there, the
patch
categories-root_system-6588.patch
doesn't apply properly.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-comb
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:14:26PM -0800, Christian Stump wrote:
> > Due to conflict with trac_8898 the combinat queue is currently
> > broken... wait few minutes before pull and push.
>
> This patch doesn't seem to apply properly with sage-4.6. Could you
> please recheck?
I might be the culprit
> Due to conflict with trac_8898 the combinat queue is currently
> broken... wait few minutes before pull and push.
This patch doesn't seem to apply properly with sage-4.6. Could you
please recheck?
Thanks, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 1/15/11 9:45 AM, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Due to conflict with trac_8898 the combinat queue is currently
broken... wait few minutes before pull and push.
This conflict is resolved and should work on sage-4.6.1. But
application de trac_9065-facade_parents-nt.patch
patching file sage/catego
>
> Due to conflict with trac_8898 the combinat queue is currently
> broken... wait few minutes before pull and push.
>
This conflict is resolved and should work on sage-4.6.1. But
application de trac_9065-facade_parents-nt.patch
patching file sage/categories/enumerated_sets.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at
39 matches
Mail list logo
