On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:58:36PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> > It looks #12215 had a positive review on trac at one point (4 months ago),
> > so that's probably the explanation for its location in the series file.
Indeed.
> Thanks for investigating this! If 12215 is rebased in the queue, on
Hi Hugh,
> It looks #12215 had a positive review on trac at one point (4 months ago), so
> that's probably the explanation for its location in the series file.
>
> Recently (before the conflict between 13762 and 13605) ,
Travis fixed this (and I rebased another patch), so the queue should appl
Hi Anne--
It looks #12215 had a positive review on trac at one point (4 months ago),
so that's probably the explanation for its location in the series file.
Recently (before the conflict between 13762 and 13605) , the queue did
apply if trac12215_segfault_fixes.patch was disabled, and sage ra
