On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> On 8/29/12 12:16 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:01:13PM -0700, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>This one looks really serious. In some ways seems to be computer
>>>dependent because my answers seem to h
On 8/29/12 12:16 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:01:13PM -0700, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
>>Hi,
>>This one looks really serious. In some ways seems to be computer
>>dependent because my answers seem to have twice as
>>many digits as yours.
>
> This really look
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:16:10 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:01:13PM -0700, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
> >Hi,
> >This one looks really serious. In some ways seems to be computer
> >dependent because my answers seem to have twice as
> >many
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:01:13PM -0700, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
>Hi,
>This one looks really serious. In some ways seems to be computer
>dependent because my answers seem to have twice as
>many digits as yours.
This really looks like an integer overflow (in the communication with
Sy
Hi,
This one looks really serious. In some ways seems to be computer
dependent because my answers seem to have twice as
many digits as yours.
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(QQ)
sage: p = Sym.p()
sage: s = Sym.s()
sage: s(p[2,2])
s[1, 1, 1, 1] - s[2, 1, 1] + 2*s[2, 2] - s[3, 1] + s[4]
sage: g = s
On 8/29/12 8:20 AM, Franco Saliola wrote:
> Someone sent me the following sage session, which I cannot reproduce,
> but I'm asking whether this is a known issue and whether someone can
> reproduce it:
>
>
> sage: p=SFAPower(QQ)
> sage: s=SFASchur(QQ)
>
> sage: f
Hello Florent!
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> Hi Franco,
>
>> >> Someone sent me the following sage session, which I cannot reproduce,
>> >> but I'm asking whether this is a known issue and whether someone can
>> >> reproduce it:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> sage: p=SFAPow
Hi Franco,
> >> Someone sent me the following sage session, which I cannot reproduce,
> >> but I'm asking whether this is a known issue and whether someone can
> >> reproduce it:
> >>
> >>
> >> sage: p=SFAPower(QQ)
> >> sage: s=SFASchur(QQ)
> >>
> >> sage: f = p([1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1])/99
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Hi Franco,
>
> Will this also happen on this person's computer with sage-5.3.rc0?
> I think I am running this on the same computer, but I do not have sage-5.0.1
> installed any longer.
Don't know. He hasn't upgraded yet. I've tried this on
Hi Franco,
Will this also happen on this person's computer with sage-5.3.rc0?
I think I am running this on the same computer, but I do not have sage-5.0.1
installed any longer.
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(QQ)
sage: p = Sym.powersum()
sage: s = Sym.schur()
sage: f = p([1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1])/9
Someone sent me the following sage session, which I cannot reproduce,
but I'm asking whether this is a known issue and whether someone can
reproduce it:
sage: p=SFAPower(QQ)
sage: s=SFASchur(QQ)
sage: f = p([1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1])/990 + p([2,2,2,2,2,1])/10 +
p([5,5,1])/10 - p([10,1])/10 + p([9,
11 matches
Mail list logo
