Re: [sage-combinat-devel] cristallographic takes two l

2013-06-01 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Yes indeed, and that is what I have done in the patch. Sorry for the mistake here. Le vendredi 31 mai 2013 22:44:37 UTC+2, Anne Schilling a écrit : > > Hi Frederic, > > If you want the English spelling, I think it is "crystallographic". > > Best, > > Anne > > On 5/31/13 12:41 PM, Fr�d�ric

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] cristallographic takes two l

2013-05-31 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Frederic, If you want the English spelling, I think it is "crystallographic". Best, Anne On 5/31/13 12:41 PM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > And it is spelled in sage/combinat with just one ! > > I have made a (little bomb) patch at > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14673 > > turnin

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] cristallographic takes two l

2013-05-31 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Federic, If you want the English spelling, I think it is "crystallographic". Best, Anne On 5/31/13 12:41 PM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > And it is spelled in sage/combinat with just one ! > > I have made a (little bomb) patch at > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14673 > > turning

[sage-combinat-devel] cristallographic takes two l

2013-05-31 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
And it is spelled in sage/combinat with just one ! I have made a (little bomb) patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14673 turning everything to cristallographic I think this is necessary, but I am afraid it may cause a lot of trouble in the combinat queue Opinions ? Frederic