On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:53:01 -0500, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've updated my source via the hg bundle (and spkg files) in http://
> sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/current/ and am currently compiling
> 1.4.3.alpha. (Is there a way to get that alpha version via
> mercurial?)
On Oct 25, 2006, at 1:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
[...]
> I'll be working on the linear algebra from probably 6pm (washington
> time)
> to
> midnight (at least).
>
> William
I've updated my source via the hg bundle (and spkg files) in http://
sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/current/ and a
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:36:57 -0500, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2006, at 21:17 , didier deshommes wrote:
>> On 10/25/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> You should do RR('61/3.0') or RR('61')/RR('3.0') instead of
>>> what you wrote above.
>>
>> Even more
> Are you asking for a translation of the existing SAGE into into
> languages other than english, or a translation of the current SAGE
> intro into a nice colourful well set out intro on a web page like this
> one (which has obviously been done by a girl)?
Please keep in mind that this is a publi
On Oct 25, 2006, at 21:17 , didier deshommes wrote:
>
> On 10/25/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You should do RR('61/3.0') or RR('61')/RR('3.0') instead of
>> what you wrote above.
>
> Even more convenient. Is that in SAGE-1.4.1? In sage 1.4, I get an
> error when I try it:
> sa
On 10/25/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should do RR('61/3.0') or RR('61')/RR('3.0') instead of
> what you wrote above.
Even more convenient. Is that in SAGE-1.4.1? In sage 1.4, I get an
error when I try it:
sage: RR('61/1.0')
--
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:17:53 -0500, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 10/25/06, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> When asked 61/3.0, SAGE returns:
>>
>> 20.332
>>
>> Now I understand that floating point numbers are often rounded down to
>> prevent floating poi
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:03:33 -0500, David Harvey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm signing off for now... I got HAS_DICTIONARY working, but I can't get
> the corresponding doctests working.
>
> Specifically, when I run "./sage -t devel/sage/sage/ext/*.py", it
> doesn't notice the file I have
On 10/25/06, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When asked 61/3.0, SAGE returns:
>
> 20.332
>
> Now I understand that floating point numbers are often rounded down to
> prevent floating point drift. But I was wondering if rounding it down
> in the manner above is quite necessary.
When asked 61/3.0, SAGE returns:
20.332
Now I understand that floating point numbers are often rounded down to
prevent floating point drift. But I was wondering if rounding it down
in the manner above is quite necessary. Perhaps that last 2 should be a
3.
Bill.
--~--~-~--~
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:45:14 -0500, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I will be more than glad to translate to Spanish, even when there is
>>> probably other Spanish speakers in this list.
>>>
>>>
>> If you have the energy to translate const.tex, a big
Hi,
Anyway interested in the numerical / algebraic interface in SAGE, might
want to
look at
http://www-sop.inria.fr/galaad/software/synaps/
It's a GPL'd C++ library for doing numerical and algebraic stuff together
and
seems mature. It can't build with fortran, etc.
I skimmed some
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:31:39 -0500, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/current/
>>
>> I've also put my new pyrex and ipython versions there too.
>
> So I'm assuming I just put the .spkg files somewhere in the tree and do
> sage -b, or is t
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:45:14 -0500, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I will be more than glad to translate to Spanish, even when there is
>> probably other Spanish speakers in this list.
>>
>
> If you have the energy to translate const.tex, a big document, feel free
> to add/modify
> exa
Alfredo Portes wrote:
>> I was wondering what the purpose of those translations would be. Because if
>> you really want to use SAGE you have to speak English (for now). So if
>> somebody who doesn't speak English is convinced to try SAGE because of such a
>> tutorial he will not be able to use SAG
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:08:44 -0500, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is way cool! If you issues with the current tree are the linear
> algebra stuff, it can't be in much worse shape than mine--can I pull?
> Also, did you want any more help with the linear algebra stuff?
Yes,
> I was wondering what the purpose of those translations would be. Because if
> you really want to use SAGE you have to speak English (for now). So if
> somebody who doesn't speak English is convinced to try SAGE because of such a
> tutorial he will not be able to use SAGE afterward.
>
I have to
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 18:12, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:34:55 -0500, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you asking for a translation of the existing SAGE into into
> > languages other than english, or a translation of the current SAGE
> > intro into a nice colou
On 10/25/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fernando,
>
> I just implemented "??" source code introspection for Pyrex-defined
> function for SAGE.
Great, thanks for the patch. I'll apply it later to the ipython SVN trunk.
Cheers,
f
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:34:55 -0500, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you asking for a translation of the existing SAGE into into
> languages other than english, or a translation of the current SAGE
> intro into a nice colourful well set out intro on a web page like this
> one (which h
Are you asking for a translation of the existing SAGE into into
languages other than english, or a translation of the current SAGE
intro into a nice colourful well set out intro on a web page like this
one (which has obviously been done by a girl)?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
Does anybody want to make a translation of a SAGE intro like this?
http://cocoa.dima.unige.it/WhatIsCoCoA/WhatIsCoCoA-English.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:48:16 -0500, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I can't wait to see this one!
I also implemented "sage -tnew", which tests only the sage library code
that has changed
since you last recorded with hg_sage.record(). You had requested this a
while ago.
Will
On 10/25/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to mention that while working on the linear algebra, etc.,
> in SAGE
> tonight, I got tired of waiting for the nice new Pyrex-relatd features
> several people
> have talked with me about. So I completely implemented s
On Oct 25, 2006, at 5:02 AM, William Stein wrote:
> * foo?? now gives the source code of foo now, even if foo
> is
> defined
> in Pyrex.
[...]
> The source code brick wall you get when you hit Pyrex
> code in
> the
> interpreter is gone.
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 11:02, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to mention that while working on the linear algebra, etc.,
> in SAGE tonight, I got tired of waiting for the nice new Pyrex-relatd
> features several people have talked with me about. So I completely
> implemented so
Hi,
I just wanted to mention that while working on the linear algebra, etc.,
in SAGE
tonight, I got tired of waiting for the nice new Pyrex-relatd features
several people
have talked with me about. So I completely implemented some of them:
* foo?? now gives the source code of fo
Fernando,
I just implemented "??" source code introspection for Pyrex-defined
function for SAGE.
E.g., one can now do this:
sage: n = Mod(3,7)# a Pyrex extension class
sage: n.is_zero??
Type: builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:
String Form:
Namespace: Interactive
28 matches
Mail list logo
