On Feb 24, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Adds options "-bt" and "-btnew" for "build current and test/test new".
Perhaps -bt should take all the test options rather than having a
separate -btnew
> Adds option "-r clone" for "switch to and run clone".
I like it.
> Changes cloning
See Trac #267, IIRC.
Nick
On Feb 23, 2:58 pm, "Nick Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm touching various parts of clone, so I'll add this to my TODO
> list. If you make a trac and assign it to me, it will more likely get
> done.
>
> Nick
>
> On Feb 23, 4:08 am, "Robert Miller" <[EMAIL P
Adds options "-bt" and "-btnew" for "build current and test/test new".
Adds option "-r clone" for "switch to and run clone".
Changes cloning so that "-clone existing" switches to "existing"
clone.
Patch is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu:9002/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/267/ncalexan-scripts-c
Dear folks,
While we are on the topic of "Combinatorics in SAGE", it will be a healthy
exercise to make a todo list of what is needed. I look forward to the day
when I can teach Combinatorics (undergrad) classes in CS/Math using SAGE.
For starters volunteers can sift through standard textbooks to
I'm almost done with the parts on partitions, permutations, tableaux,
skew tableaux, and tabloids.
On 2/24/07, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe something for partitions too... I'm working on stuff that's all
> partitions and permutations, and SAGE doesn't seem to speak fluently
I just finished packaging and testing a new version of SageX. You can
find the spkg in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/robertwb/patches/
Also, sagex-20070221-mod.patch needs to be applied to your sage
repository too (fixes incompatibilities due to int**int now being
illegal, and a cou
Maybe something for partitions too... I'm working on stuff that's all
partitions and permutations, and SAGE doesn't seem to speak fluently
in this area yet.
On Feb 23, 3:02 pm, "Nick Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 1:01 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > O
[oops, resend: forgot the sage cc. sorry]
Hi Pablo,
[ cc-ing sage-dev again, since someone there may have better things to
say than me ]
On 2/24/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando, it my opinion, it is not true that this way, things
> will "just work"
>
> For example, I'
William Stein wrote:
> On 2/24/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But in an upgraded sage-2.1.4 I got:
>>
>
> This is because unfortunately for 1 days some files were left
> out so clean installs of sage-2.1.3 broke. You have to delete or move
>/home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.1.3/devel
Hi Pablo,
[ I'm cc-ing the SAGE dev list where others may contribute or correct
my points if they feel I've misrepresented SAGE. ]
On 2/24/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There this one thing I like in Sage, and one that I don't:
>
> - the one I like is the effort of trying t
On 2/22/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This problem could be good, I don't know why but I like to work on hard
> > problems ... Where could I find some documentation about it? Could you
> > help me to start on it?
> >
>
> 1. Leon has several papers, referenced in the GUAVA manual
On 2/24/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But in an upgraded sage-2.1.4 I got:
>
This is because unfortunately for 1 days some files were left
out so clean installs of sage-2.1.3 broke. You have to delete or move
/home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.1.3/devel/sage-main
then do "sage -i sage-
> PD: Actually I'm on FOSDEM '07, any one of you know it??? This event is
> the biggest free software developers event on Europe ... may be the next
> year will be a nice think to present here the SAGE project? What do you
> think?
As I'm know on an event I forgot to put the url, if you want to
William Stein wrote:
In a fresh installed sage-2.1.4:
>
> Please let me know if you have trouble. In particular:
> (1) I'm very interested to know what happens when
>you do "make test". In particular, do any tests hang/fail?
---
Hello to every body, this June I'll plane to do a talk about SAGE on the
free software workshop on Barcelona, Catalonia at [1]. They are a regional
talks about free software that are organized by Polytechnic University of
Catalonia. Are there any document that I could use? What do you think that
c
Hi
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 11:15:27AM -0500, Pere Urb?n Bayes wrote:
> Hello to every body, some time ago I was involved to with people that was
> trying to package SAGE for debian, how about it? Is this done it? If I
> could do something know I'll hope I could help!!!
I'd love to see that, but
Hello to every body, some time ago I was involved to with people that was
trying to package SAGE for debian, how about it? Is this done it? If I
could do something know I'll hope I could help!!!
Regards,
Pere
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send emai
Hi David and all, I read your mail and I'm agree with your first and
second proposal, I know that problems are hard to solve but this problems
are nicest for me!!!. I think I'll take the to problem on, but I'll start
with the automorphisme work, what do you think?, now I'll start with
trying the l
Hello,
I've posted my pictures from last week here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/pics/new/2007-02/
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegr
On Saturday 24 February 2007 12:42 am, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please subscribe me...
You can sign up at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
If you try and have any trouble at all, let me know. The rest
of this email is being cc'
20 matches
Mail list logo
