On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 8/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Regarding Internet Explorer, the fact is it would
>>> be 1-2 day's of work to make the SAGE notebook reasonably
>>> usable from IE 7. Shift-enter would be replaced by
>>> a submit button a
I'm here just to say that for non-US users, the name of the program is
not the simplest to found on the web. SAGE is a name with many
different meanings and I'd suggest a more "peculiar" name that could
let the program to be found instantly on the web.
And I agree that a web site with many exampl
On 8/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Regarding Internet Explorer, the fact is it would
> > be 1-2 day's of work to make the SAGE notebook reasonably
> > usable from IE 7. Shift-enter would be replaced by
> > a submit button and some of the CSS would have to be
> > reworked,
> Regarding Internet Explorer, the fact is it would
> be 1-2 day's of work to make the SAGE notebook reasonably
> usable from IE 7. Shift-enter would be replaced by
> a submit button and some of the CSS would have to be
> reworked, but otherwise most things would work. It hasn't
> happened yet,
Hi,
I just want to post to say thanks for all the excellent feedback
on the question I asked earlier. I think it is all very valuable,
even if some options aren't possible at present.
Regarding a native Windows port, such a thing would be wonderful to
have, but unfortunately it is *totally impo
On Aug 8, 5:31 am, "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "mabshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The compartmentilazation of SAGE has been suggested many times before,
> > but as William has stated many times: This makes testing and debugging
> > infinitely more diffcult. It is also e
Pretty pictures. Seriously if you look at Mathematica's website you
see lots of crazy pictures of crazy graphs and such. The maple website
shows a video with 3d models of a robot walking along.
Does it matter whether those pictures have any mathematical content,
NO.
I know that this has been talk
From: "mabshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The compartmentilazation of SAGE has been suggested many times before,
> but as William has stated many times: This makes testing and debugging
> infinitely more diffcult. It is also extreme likely that if you use
> even minor different versions of certain
On Aug 8, 4:25 am, "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> Being a Windows user, I can't agree less.
>
> > ??? In my reading of English this sounds like you strongly disagree. :-(
>
> Yes, my English is not that great. Certainly I meant "strongl
From: "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Being a Windows user, I can't agree less.
>
> ??? In my reading of English this sounds like you strongly disagree. :-(
Yes, my English is not that great. Certainly I meant "strongly agree" :-)
> I am not sure if this is necessary but apparently Python can
On 8/7/07, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
>
> From: "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > As technically hard as it might be, I think having a native Windows
> > version of Sage - even if it includes only a subset of the standard
> > packages - would likely be a big factor in attracting more users.
>
> Bei
On Aug 8, 2:56 am, "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > As technically hard as it might be, I think having a native Windows
> > version of Sage - even if it includes only a subset of the standard
> > packages - would likely be a big factor in
William,
Some months ago I promised to look into the issue of creating a Reduce
package for Sage (as usual: as and when time permits :). While at the
ISSAC conference where Sage was conspicuous by it's complete absence!
:-(, I had a brief meeting with Winfried Neun [1] from ZIB [2] - one
of main
Pick an organization or department that uses Mathematica or Maple or
MATLAB. Find out what they use it for. Put the same capabilities into
SAGE. Give SAGE to them, possibly with a turnkey demonstration.
Rinse and repeat??
On Aug 7, 5:22 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sage-De
From: "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As technically hard as it might be, I think having a native Windows
> version of Sage - even if it includes only a subset of the standard
> packages - would likely be a big factor in attracting more users.
Being a Windows user, I can't agree less. Also, th
As technically hard as it might be, I think having a native Windows
version of Sage - even if it includes only a subset of the standard
packages - would likely be a big factor in attracting more users. In
my experience with Axiom, potential Windows users out number Linux
users by a large number (m
Being optimistic, I would hope things would pick up in the fall
compared to the summer (in fact, I think it's lucky to not have a
drop--assuming we're starting to aim for the non-research crowd too).
I don't have any specific ideas (yet), but I think the "back to
school" timeline is import
A few thoughts:
* The public sage notebook really needs to be available by default on
port 443. This brings up a lot of issues that have been
On 8/7/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The number of new downloads of SAGE per week have been roughly
> constant during the last 2-3 months. The growth of SAGE is definitely
> not what I hoped for during my talk at SAGE Days 4.Does anybody
> have any good ideas about how t
Hi Sage-Devel,
The SAGE downloads during the last week are as follows:
Linux Binary
42
OS X Binary
42
Source
91
VMware (= Windows)
57
Total .. 232
The number of new downloads of SAGE per week have been roughly
constant during the last 2-3 months. The growth o
I just installed a fresh sage 2.7.3 and the hg repository has uncommitted
changes:
$ hg status
! .hgtags
! bundle
! export
! mercurial-howto.txt
! sage/libs/linbox/matrix_rational_dense_linbox.cpp
! sage/rings/padics/polynomial/__init__.py
! sage/rings/padics/polynomial/all.py
Anybody know what
21 matches
Mail list logo
