[sage-devel] Re: hg

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/was/s/devel/sage-main/.hg$ rm hgrc > rm: remove write-protected regular file `hgrc'? y > rm: cannot remove `hgrc': Permission denied > Wait, you can't clone my repository from my home directory, since that wo

[sage-devel] Re: hg

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this supposed to happen? That should definitely not happen. It's likely a bug of some sort. Could you try just removing the file /home/was/s/devel/sage-main/.hg/hgrc? You should make your own ~jvoight/.hgrc file. Please let me know if tha

[sage-devel] Re: DSage under Windows/VMware

2007-10-11 Thread John Voight
Thanks Yi, I was able to install your patch. What exactly did this fix? Do I still have to follow the long instructions about modifying the job in case I want to include functions from a file--or is that still under development? JV --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To pos

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 12, 3:03 am, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool, count me in! JV Hello, if you are going to participate please add yourself to the list of participants at the bottom of http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug4 Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread John Voight
Cool, count me in! JV --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.6: doctest failures with cython.py on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 12, 2:15 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Oct 12, 2:05 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Weird. cython.py passes all tests for me under an upgraded 2.8.5 -> > > 2.8.6 from source install. > > > --Mike > > Hi Mike, > > I just reran > > [EMAIL PROTE

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Pyrex] C-API implementation in Pyrex 0.9.6

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
-- Forwarded message -- From: Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Oct 11, 2007 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [Pyrex] C-API implementation in Pyrex 0.9.6 To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: sage-devel@googlegroups.com, Pyrex ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Stein wrote: > (1) Suppose

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.6: doctest failures with cython.py on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 12, 2:05 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Weird. cython.py passes all tests for me under an upgraded 2.8.5 -> > 2.8.6 from source install. > > --Mike Hi Mike, I just reran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/Work-mabshoff/sage-2.8.6$ ./sage -t devel/sage- main/sage/misc/cython.py sa

[sage-devel] Re: DSage & Zombie issue on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread Yi Qiang
Yup, you are right. The processes are dead but have an entry in the process table. I fixed this issue btw. Cheers, Yi -- http://www.yiqiang.org On 10/11/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 11, 2007, at 10:19 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > On 10/11/07, Yi Qiang <[E

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.6: doctest failures with cython.py on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread Mike Hansen
Weird. cython.py passes all tests for me under an upgraded 2.8.5 -> 2.8.6 from source install. --Mike On 10/11/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following happens on a compiled from source 2.8.6 on sage.math: > > sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/misc/cython.py > *

[sage-devel] Sage 2.8.6: doctest failures with cython.py on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
The following happens on a compiled from source 2.8.6 on sage.math: sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/misc/cython.py ** File "cython.py", line 316: sage: g = cython_lambda('double x, double y', 'x*x + y*y + x + y + 17*x + 3.2') E

[sage-devel] Re: DSage & Zombie issue on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Oct 11, 2007, at 10:19 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On 10/11/07, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> I think there is a problem with the way the individual workers are >> restarted >> which leaves them as zombie processes. I'll look into this. >> >> Cheers, >> Yi > > Yep.

[sage-devel] Re: Version of sage on sage.math on October 4th

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 10, 1:07 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Oct 9, 8:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/9/07, Iftikhar Burhanuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, William Stein wrote: > > > > I think thememoryleaks that we identified

[sage-devel] Fwd: [Pyrex] C-API implementation in Pyrex 0.9.6

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
-- Forwarded message -- From: Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Oct 11, 2007 11:19 AM Subject: Re: [Pyrex] C-API implementation in Pyrex 0.9.6 To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: sage-devel@googlegroups.com, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pyrex ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wouldn't be able to participate in a bug day on Sunday, so I'd vote > > for a weekday or a Saturday, for whatever weight my vote holds. > > Same here. > OK, Saturday October 20, 2007 it is: http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug4 --~--

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > mabshoff wrote: >> Hello, >> >> it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets >> keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another one. >> As most people now have to teach/attend class I would suggest the >>

[sage-devel] Re: [Pyrex] C-API implementation in Pyrex 0.9.6

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the C-API support has been rewritten for integration in Pyrex, but not much to ... Hi, Can I ask a few naive questions about "the C-API support", since I know that me and _many_ of the people I work with are confused about what this support

[sage-devel] Re: numerical optimization in sage

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, medvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The majority of TOMLAB (>80%) is code developed in C and Fortran > (embedded for use in Matlab). Does TOMLAB also have a Python interface? If so, how much does it cost? Thanks for writing, William > OpenOpt is definitely not equivalent to T

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread Mike Hansen
Saturday the 20th works for me. --Mike On 10/11/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/11/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets > > > > keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another

[sage-devel] Re: DSage & Zombie issue on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > I think there is a problem with the way the individual workers are restarted > which leaves them as zombie processes. I'll look into this. > > Cheers, > Yi Yep. I killed them all, since my entire huge job finished (yes!). But yeah

[sage-devel] Re: DSage & Zombie issue on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread Yi Qiang
Hi Michael, I think there is a problem with the way the individual workers are restarted which leaves them as zombie processes. I'll look into this. Cheers, Yi -- http://www.yiqiang.org On 10/11/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > zombies have taken over sage.math: > > top -

[sage-devel] DSage & Zombie issue on sage.math

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
Hello, zombies have taken over sage.math: top - 09:48:46 up 36 days, 18:09, 17 users, load average: 2.24, 1.79, 1.44 Tasks: 864 total, 3 running, 550 sleeping, 0 stopped, 311 zombie Cpu(s): 8.1%us, 1.0%sy, 13.1%ni, 76.7%id, 1.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st They all appear to be dsage jo

[sage-devel] Fwd: ode_solver

2007-10-11 Thread Marshall Hampton
-- Forwarded message -- From: Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Oct 10, 12:07 pm Subject: ode_solver To: sage-support I have used cython to try to speed up my function evaluations. The computation that used to take about 2400 seconds (40 minutes) now takes 38 seconds -

[sage-devel] Re: Introductory SAGE talk in Oslo

2007-10-11 Thread Georg Muntingh
Yes, that is on purpose. I use them when I change subject or when I want the audience to look at me, instead of at the screen. It is quite a smart trick. The following article neatly describes the effect of a black screen: http://www.bertdecker.com/experience/2007/03/blog_entry_date.html I agree

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets > > > keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another one. > > > As most people now have to teach/attend class I would suggest the next > > > Sunday, Oct. 20

[sage-devel] Re: Introductory SAGE talk in Oslo

2007-10-11 Thread William Stein
On 10/11/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Excellent! Thanks. However, the pdf at > http://folk.uio.no/georgmu/Writings/SAGE-Oslo/ > has some black pages. Do you know why this is? I suspect they are intentional -- a dramatic pause -- it was a very stylish talk after all. Anyway, th

[sage-devel] Re: Introductory SAGE talk in Oslo

2007-10-11 Thread David Joyner
Excellent! Thanks. However, the pdf at http://folk.uio.no/georgmu/Writings/SAGE-Oslo/ has some black pages. Do you know why this is? +++ On 10/11/07, Georg Muntingh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tied up the loose ends, and now you can find the PDF, ODP and

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 11, 2:35 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > Hello, > > > it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets > > keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another one. > > As most people now have to teach/attend class I would s

[sage-devel] Re: Introductory SAGE talk in Oslo

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 11, 3:26 pm, Georg Muntingh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tied up the loose ends, and now you can find the PDF, ODP and HTML > files at my website,http://folk.uio.no/georgmu/. Visuals can be > found in the directoryhttp://folk.uio.no/georgmu/Writings/SAGE-Oslo/Graphics/ > . Well, yes ..

[sage-devel] Re: Introductory SAGE talk in Oslo

2007-10-11 Thread Georg Muntingh
I tied up the loose ends, and now you can find the PDF, ODP and HTML files at my website, http://folk.uio.no/georgmu/ . Visuals can be found in the directory http://folk.uio.no/georgmu/Writings/SAGE-Oslo/Graphics/ . --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, sen

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread Jason Grout
mabshoff wrote: > Hello, > > it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets > keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another one. > As most people now have to teach/attend class I would suggest the next > Sunday, Oct. 20th, instead of a weekday. Let me know

[sage-devel] Re: Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Thursday 11 October 2007, mabshoff wrote: > Hello, > > it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets > keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another one. > As most people now have to teach/attend class I would suggest the next > Sunday, Oct. 20th, inste

[sage-devel] Bug Day 4 Proposal: Oct. 20th, 2007

2007-10-11 Thread mabshoff
Hello, it has been a while since the last Bug Day and the number of tickets keep growing, so I figured it would be a good idea to do another one. As most people now have to teach/attend class I would suggest the next Sunday, Oct. 20th, instead of a weekday. Let me know what you think. Cheers, M

[sage-devel] Re: numerical optimization in sage

2007-10-11 Thread medvall
The majority of TOMLAB (>80%) is code developed in C and Fortran (embedded for use in Matlab). OpenOpt is definitely not equivalent to TOMLAB. Best wishes, Marcus Tomlab Optimization Inc. http://tomopt.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email