[sage-devel] Re: basic java question

2008-01-05 Thread Ted Kosan
Its all building from source now. Here is the list of packages that needed to be created: commons-lang commons-logging commons-cli bcmail bcprov itext jmol-acme netscape vecmath-objectclub jmol It runs from the command line but I am not quite sure how to test it completely at this point so ther

[sage-devel] Re: Stand-alone sage scripts.

2008-01-05 Thread Carl Witty
On Jan 3, 10:29 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a bug with sage or with something on my > systems (various Fedora releases). As described at > http://sagemath.org/doc/html/tut/node49.html, I try to create a stand- > alone sage script: > > Using "#!/us

[sage-devel] First Sage Screencast

2008-01-05 Thread Timothy Clemans
GHOP (Google Highly Open Participation Contest) contestant Benjamin Peterson created a 20 minute screencast introducing Sage. He followed my guidelines to a tea, see http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=301. Currently the best quality version released so

[sage-devel] anyone with osx 10.4 intel please test this for dvd

2008-01-05 Thread Joshua Kantor
Hello. for the dvd we are including a dmg file. There was some problems with the initial version of this. I believe the following is working, but if anyone else could test that following the instructions works fine on their system that would be appreciated. Again this is osx 10.4 intel http://sag

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Justin Walker
On Jan 5, 2008, at 7:16 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Sage 2.9.2 has been released. It is available at > > http://sagemath.org/download.html > > The following people contributed to this release: Upgrade from 2.9.1.1 on Mac OS X (10.5.1, Core Duo) without problems. Tested w

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > > > On Jan 6, 12:51 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >>> Yep, there's several "invisible" atoms floating around :-) It's an >>> amazing piece of software, but still very chemistry-centric. >> Quoting from IRC: >> >> I said: *I said* >> ma

[sage-devel] Re: Enthought mayavi2 as a library

2008-01-05 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: > On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just tried to mimic the mlab session at: >> http://gael-varoquaux.info/blog/?p=3 >> >> With some tricks you can do this in sage, if you have the experimental >> ETS installed :) [...] > > Cool. tha

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 6, 12:51 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > > Yep, there's several "invisible" atoms floating around :-) It's an > > amazing piece of software, but still very chemistry-centric. > > Quoting from IRC: > > I said: Hi Jaap, > mabshoff On competition: I c

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 5, 11:31 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Jan 5, 11:24 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Also when I do start sage I get an exception > > "Unable to determine current branch" > > That is a problem with a symbolic link for the main sage repo. > > >

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Jaap Spies
Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > Yep, there's several "invisible" atoms floating around :-) It's an > amazing piece of software, but still very chemistry-centric. > Quoting from IRC: I said: mabshoff On competition: I can't stand that chemists beat the astronomers on 3D :( Jaap --~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jan 5, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > On Jan 5, 2008, at 15:05 , Jaap Spies wrote: > >> >> mabshoff wrote: >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> Sage 2.9.2 has been released. It is available at >>> >>>http://sagemath.org/download.html >>> >> >> I upgraded from sage-2.9.1.1, but >>

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Jan 5, 2008, at 15:05 , Jaap Spies wrote: > > mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> Sage 2.9.2 has been released. It is available at >> >>http://sagemath.org/download.html >> > > I upgraded from sage-2.9.1.1, but > --

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > Sage 2.9.2 has been released. It is available at > >http://sagemath.org/download.html > I upgraded from sage-2.9.1.1, but -- | SAGE Version 2.9.2, Release Date: 2008-01-05

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 5, 11:24 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also when I do start sage I get an exception > "Unable to determine current branch" That is a problem with a symbolic link for the main sage repo. > On Jan 5, 2:23 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I tried the osx

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread Joshua Kantor
Also when I do start sage I get an exception "Unable to determine current branch" On Jan 5, 2:23 pm, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried the osx 10.4 dmg. It mounts correctly as a volume. > > However, when I drag the sage folder over, > about halfway through I get a dialog > > (You

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread Joshua Kantor
I tried the osx 10.4 dmg. It mounts correctly as a volume. However, when I drag the sage folder over, about halfway through I get a dialog (You cannot copy "singular" to the destination because its name is the same as the name of an item on the destination except for the case of some characters)

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jan 5, 2008, at 1:56 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > On Jan 5, 10:14 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Robert, > >> Did anything ever come of doing an OS X .app? > > The skeleton is stil there and I think most problems have been solved > in general. What it needs is probably a li

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 5, 10:14 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, > Did anything ever come of doing an OS X .app? The skeleton is stil there and I think most problems have been solved in general. What it needs is probably a little polish and a script to automatically create it via -bdis

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
Did anything ever come of doing an OS X .app? On Jan 5, 2008, at 1:09 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > we have some binaries available: > > * Linux: 32 and 64 bit > * OSX: those are DMGs now > * no VMWare image yet, but the VMWare image upgrades fine. > > I am currently mirroring the

[sage-devel] Sage 2.9.2 binaries available

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, we have some binaries available: * Linux: 32 and 64 bit * OSX: those are DMGs now * no VMWare image yet, but the VMWare image upgrades fine. I am currently mirroring the images out, but they are all on sagemath.org. Please download and report back if they work or not, epecially

[sage-devel] Re: San Diego!

2008-01-05 Thread Mike Hansen
I'm leaving Tucson now and on the road to San Diego. --Mike On Jan 5, 2008 10:18 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's beautiful, though there are terrifying rumors that it might rain. :-) > > > > --William > > Well I assure you it is raining here in Seattle (it was -10 F at m

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread William Stein
On Jan 5, 2008 12:05 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is my own notebook and the output of version() is 'SAGE Version > 2.9.2, Release Date: 2008-01-05' > > Ah wait I get it now there were updates to the Sage Notebook itself. > Okay now the pain of killing my notebooks on sage

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Timothy Clemans
It is my own notebook and the output of version() is 'SAGE Version 2.9.2, Release Date: 2008-01-05' Ah wait I get it now there were updates to the Sage Notebook itself. Okay now the pain of killing my notebooks on sage.math. I always have a hard time doing that. On Jan 5, 11:54 am, Robert Bradsh

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
It looks like the public notebooks haven't been updated/restarted (but the sage they interface has been). - Robert On Jan 5, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote: > > I'm confused about the output of two files instead of a popup of java > applet for viewing my plots. https://sage.math.wa

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread Timothy Clemans
I'm confused about the output of two files instead of a popup of java applet for viewing my plots. https://sage.math.washington.edu:8909/home/pub/3/ What do I do with these jmol files? On Jan 5, 11:34 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In sage-2.9.2 Robert and I unfortunate

[sage-devel] Re: sage.graphs, lad

2008-01-05 Thread Ted Kosan
Here are versions of the code that do not need the newlines stripped: #GUI widgets. html('http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/tkosan/mathrider/SwingSet/"\ archive="SwingSet.jar" MAYSCRIPT>') #2D graphics. html('http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/tkosan/mathrider/Java2D/"\ archive="Java2Demo.j

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2.rc1 released

2008-01-05 Thread William Stein
On Jan 5, 2008 9:00 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After 6 hours, this built successfully on my sad little G4 OS X 10.4 > laptop. I have to go to the airport so I cannot do a complete 'make > check', but I did test the new 3D plot stuff and it appears to work > fine - exciting! Sinc

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread William Stein
Hi, In sage-2.9.2 Robert and I unfortunately didn't have time to add anything to the tutorial, constructions or reference manual about actually using the new plotting functionality. These are the new plotting commands (see below): bash-3.2$ ./sage ---

[sage-devel] Re: sage.graphs, lad

2008-01-05 Thread Ted Kosan
Robert wrote: > > > I don't have any experience with wx widgets yet. One of the big > > > challenges Sage developers have been working on lately is interactive > > > widget like features. The main challenge is the existing notebook > > > structure, which uses web browsers to serve an application.

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2.rc1 released

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 5, 6:00 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Marshall, > After 6 hours, this built successfully on my sad little G4 OS X 10.4 > laptop. I have to go to the airport so I cannot do a complete 'make > check', but I did test the new 3D plot stuff and it appears to work > fine - excit

[sage-devel] Re: San Diego!

2008-01-05 Thread Robert Miller
> It's beautiful, though there are terrifying rumors that it might rain. :-) > > --William Well I assure you it is raining here in Seattle (it was -10 F at my parents' house Thursday!). My plane is due in at 3:12 tomorrow afternoon, so I will see you all at the booth! --~--~-~--~~---

[sage-devel] Re: sage.graphs, lad

2008-01-05 Thread Robert Miller
On Jan 3, 2008 8:48 PM, Brent Woodruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Miller wrote: > > Right now, it's there but somewhat hidden. I'm not sure why it's > > hidden. You can do something like > > > > sage: G = graphs.PetersenGraph() > > sage: G.__get_pos__() > > When I first looked at the Sage

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2.rc1 released

2008-01-05 Thread mhampton
After 6 hours, this built successfully on my sad little G4 OS X 10.4 laptop. I have to go to the airport so I cannot do a complete 'make check', but I did test the new 3D plot stuff and it appears to work fine - exciting! Since 2.9.2 is already released I won't bother to do 'make check' later.

[sage-devel] SAGE 2.9.2 released

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, Sage 2.9.2 has been released. It is available at http://sagemath.org/download.html The following people contributed to this release: * Michael Abshoff * Francois Bissey * Tom Boothby * Robert Bradshaw * Burcin Erocal * David Harvey * Josh Kantor * Willem Jan Pal

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2.rc1 released

2008-01-05 Thread Willem Jan Palenstijn
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:53:18PM -0800, mabshoff wrote: > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.9.2.rc1.tar 64 bit gentoo linux: build successful, all doctests passed except an xgcd one which has already been fixed according to William on IRC. -Willem Jan --~--~-~--~

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: sage.calculus

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 4, 11:16 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi, I meant to reply to this earlier, but I got sidetracked by the release. > I got this email from Peter Doyle and with his permission I am > forwarding it here. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Peter Doy

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 5, 10:13 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm also going to try to see if I can get SAGE to work on OpenBSD; > > that's a much more secure OS (and it's easier to build a kernel on), Well, opinions vary on that one, but OpenBSD is certainly a pretty secure OS regardin

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released

2008-01-05 Thread mabshoff
On Jan 5, 12:35 pm, "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007 6:41 PM, mabshoff > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > thanks to Ted Kosan we now have a 2.9 VMWare image available for > > download at sagemath.org. It has been mirrored out to > > sage.math.washington.edu and modul

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released

2008-01-05 Thread Alfredo Portes
On Dec 17, 2007 6:41 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks to Ted Kosan we now have a 2.9 VMWare image available for > download at sagemath.org. It has been mirrored out to > sage.math.washington.edu and modular.fas.harvard.edu. It is about 70mb > larger than the 2.8.15 image, but I am

[sage-devel] Re: Rosetta translations

2008-01-05 Thread Alfredo Portes
On Jan 5, 2008 5:37 AM, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I partially agree. I must admit that this is a good point. > But now just another idea (yes I do like live cds): if Sage gets into > Debian, making a live cd should be no problem at all!??? Or am I missing > something? Not really.

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.9.2.rc1 released

2008-01-05 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hi, > > 2.9.2.rc1 is very close to the final release. The only changes that > will still go in are 3D plotting fixes and anything critical that > turns up and is simple enough to be refereed. 2.9.2 should happen > by midnight tonight (PST). > > The tarball [198MB] is at > >

[sage-devel] Re: Rosetta translations

2008-01-05 Thread Fabio Tonti
> > The biggest advantage of a live cd is that it lets you experiment with > the software without modifying anything on your system. This is great > for marketing purposes, but pointless for everyday use. Since the > notebook servers (sagenb.com) already provide an environment where > people can pl

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released

2008-01-05 Thread William Stein
On Jan 5, 2008 1:04 AM, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi William, > > I'm compressing vmware-sage-deluxe right now. It's 5.3G uncompressed, > running SAGE-2.9.1.1 on Xubuntu-7.10, with VMTools and the latest > updates. > > > I remember vaguely seeing that error message once. You defi