_sage_init_ sounds like the right solution. The problem is that for
many objects, printing all the information that would make them
reproducible is really ugly. For example, if I have
[1 2]
[3 4]
Is this over the integers, or the rationals, or the integers mod 17?
Or perhaps it's a symboli
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> the rc1 release is finally out. Various old doctest failures, most new
> patches got their failures fixed along the way. Instead of a deep
> freeze I ended up merging quite some number of patches to stay on top
> of things. Tarball is at
>
> http://sage.math.wa
That all depends on how it is written. If you are using a lot of
python data types, it will be slower. If not, you can write Cython
that translates to nearly pure C (and runs at that speed).
- Robert
On Mar 4, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have this request for C
Hi,
I have this request for Cython benchmarks on a blog post of mine - is
there any data out there, specifically comparing Cython to C/C++?
--
Carlo Hamalainen
http://carlo-hamalainen.net
-- Forwarded message --
http://carlo-hamalainen.net/blog/?p=19
Author : Robert Samal
E
At 10:07 -0800 4/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Find the following line in js.py, in the function cell_blur(id):
>
> setTimeout("set_class('eval_button"+id+"','eval_button')", 100)
>
>and comment it out. It's responsible for making the link disappear
>when you've left the cell.
That resulte
>> If that doesn't work, then I'll be really baffled (ok, even more baffled
>> than I am already). If it does work, then change the 100 to a 1000 (delay
>> in miliseconds), and see if it still works.
>
> Ahah! Now it works --- I can finally click on "evaluate"! Thanks very much.
>
> The criti
On Mar 4, 2008, at 10:07 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, bill purvis wrote:
[snip]
>
> It's frustrating not to have access to the platform that this is
> broken on... I'm running Ubuntu 7.04 and the same version of
> Firefox, and it works fine for me. But, I might have a sol
Here's the relevant ticket: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2387
--Mike
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is not general, but if M is your matrix, the code 'matrix(R, m,
> n, list(M))' is pretty easy.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> On 4-Mar-08, at 10:5
This is not general, but if M is your matrix, the code 'matrix(R, m,
n, list(M))' is pretty easy.
Nick
On 4-Mar-08, at 10:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> This morning I tried to copy a matrix output, edit it, and create a
> new
> matrix. It was frustrating because there seemed to be no way t
This morning I tried to copy a matrix output, edit it, and create a new
matrix. It was frustrating because there seemed to be no way to easily
cut and paste output into input. This afternoon a person I was showing
Sage to also had the same concern.
There has been discussion before on the pyt
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> the rc1 release is finally out. Various old doctest failures, most new
> patches got their failures fixed along the way. Instead of a deep
> freeze I ended up merging quite some number of patches to stay on top
> of things. Tarball is at
>
> http://sage.math.wa
Hi there,
It is a known issue, that
{{{
1
2
3
}}}
in the notebook outputs:
{{{
3
}}}
However, this behavior is not uniform. E.g. this (note the spaces)
{{{
1
2
3
}}}
outputs
{{{
1
}}}
Most interestingly, this:
{{{
while True:
1
2
3
break
}}}
outputs the desired output
{{
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, bill purvis wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 27 February 2008, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Francis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> The "evaluate" links for the notebook introduced in SAGE 2.9.2 have
>>> never worked for me (Mac OS X 10.4.11, SA
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:56 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug.
> > Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy
> > e
> Ah, that is cool. Now that's a doc-test requirement that I could appreciate!
> That is, I think it is quite reasonable to require all your code be green in
> figleaf.
I think things like figleaf and -coverage are both useful/important
since they really are checking for different things. It
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Francis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The "evaluate" links for the notebook introduced in SAGE 2.9.2 have
> > never worked for me (Mac OS X 10.4.11, SAGE 2.9.2 -- 2.10.2 + either
> > Safari or Firefo
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 04:47:44 am Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Figleaf is a module for doing line coverage of Python code. I've made
> an spkg at http://sage.math.washington.edu/figleaf-latest.spkg for
> anyone who wants to try it out. It contains a script sage-figleaf
> which I threw
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Ivan Andrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug.
> Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy
> enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the
> wiki at http://wiki.
Hello all,
Figleaf is a module for doing line coverage of Python code. I've made
an spkg at http://sage.math.washington.edu/figleaf-latest.spkg for
anyone who wants to try it out. It contains a script sage-figleaf
which I threw together very quickly. To test it out, do the following
1) Make s
20 matches
Mail list logo
