[sage-devel] Re: Status of Sage 3.0.a5 with gcc 4.3/Arch Linux

2008-04-16 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 15, 2:01 pm, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have not tried to compile SAGE v3.0 yet, nor am I familiar with Arch > or its method of distributing packages. However, I did create the RPM > distributable version of SAGE. Upon reviewing the PKGBUILD file > available on the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-16 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 16, 9:22 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, > > When trying to build 3.0.alpha5 using gcc-4.3.0 on x86-Linux > (pentium4-fc6), I get the following error in givaro > > make[5]: Entering directory `/home/kate/sage/sage-3.0.alpha5-x86-Linux/ > spkg/build/givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-16 Thread Kate
Michael, When trying to build 3.0.alpha5 using gcc-4.3.0 on x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6), I get the following error in givaro make[5]: Entering directory `/home/kate/sage/sage-3.0.alpha5-x86-Linux/ spkg/build/givaro-3.2.10.rc3.p0/src/src/kernel/gmp++' /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=comp

[sage-devel] Re: Fighting Spam in the wiki

2008-04-16 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 1, 8:14 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 1, 2008, at 5:43 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > if you look at > > >http://wiki.sagemath.org/RecentChanges?max_days=14 > > > you will see once again some idiot spammers creating crap pages in the > >wiki. While we aren't

[sage-devel] Re: old files not removed when installing spkg

2008-04-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:28 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > However, I even consider this a python fault (i.e. I belive a python > > > library/module should be working no matter which fi

[sage-devel] Re: old files not removed when installing spkg

2008-04-16 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, I even consider this a python fault (i.e. I belive a python > > library/module should be working no matter which files you put > > around), but I think this could be fixed by using relative imports in >

[sage-devel] Re: sage -n?

2008-04-16 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:58 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At first I liked -nb more than -n for just launching the notebook, but > I often want to rebuild and launch the notebook when testing 3d stuff, > so I guess I'll give -n and -bn +1. > > -M. Hampton This is now http://

[sage-devel] Re: new sympy spkg

2008-04-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > here is the new sympy spkg + a corresponding patch to Sage: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2941 > > When I run tests I got quite a lot of errors, but I guess they are not > related: > > $ sage

[sage-devel] Re: Bad example with NICE graph isomorphism

2008-04-16 Thread Jason Grout
Stephen Hartke wrote: > I'm going to a conference for the rest of this week, so I haven't had a > chance yet to test Sage 3.0.alpha?. It seems though that it will fix > this problem. > > I actually discovered this naughty example by comparing the results > against nauty in some code that I was

[sage-devel] new sympy spkg

2008-04-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, here is the new sympy spkg + a corresponding patch to Sage: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2941 When I run tests I got quite a lot of errors, but I guess they are not related: $ sage -testall Testing of examples currently not implemented. Testing SAGE documentation Testing SAGE

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.alpha5 released

2008-04-16 Thread John Cremona
All tests passed for me on Linux host-57-71 2.6.18.8-0.3-default #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35 UTC 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux with gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) John 2008/4/16 Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Apr 15, 2008, at 04:18 , mabshoff wrote: >

[sage-devel] Re: old files not removed when installing spkg

2008-04-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
> However, I even consider this a python fault (i.e. I belive a python > library/module should be working no matter which files you put > around), but I think this could be fixed by using relative imports in > python2.5. But then again, we are not going to break compatibility with python2.4

[sage-devel] Re: old files not removed when installing spkg

2008-04-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:32 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have the following problem: > > > > 1) current sympy spkg in Sage has a file: > > > > /sage/local/lib/python2

[sage-devel] Re: Giac/Xcas? (was Re: multivariate factoring - use maxima ?)

2008-04-16 Thread parisse
> > I got past the above OS X problems by setting CXXFLAGS, CFLAGS, > and LDFLAGS as you suggest. But then the build bombs out with this: > > ... > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I.. > -I/Users/was/build/sage-3.0.alpha1/local/include -c global.cc -o > global.o > global.cc: In function 'bo